I flew for the first time on a plane last week and I’ve seen planes take off at the airport. It looks crazy. But being on one is totally different like holy shit. The thing just FLIES. It just… Soars… Through the sky! Like whoa man. Wtf… It’s crazy. With how much these things weigh, it’s insane to me the thing can just go up and bam, there we are, we’re flying now. Like wow… Dude crazy.

  • bitwaba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 days ago

    You think that’s crazy? The ship that blocked the Suez Canal, the Ever Given, has a ship displacement (how much water is displaced when it sits in the ocean) of 265,000 Tons.

    That’s 240 million kilograms.

    And that shit just floats on fucking water maaaaan…

      • bitwaba@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        There are tons of tons, believe it or not.

        There’s the short ton (2000lbs), long ton (2240 lbs), and tonne (1000kgs) which are all measure weight. However there’s also the shipping/freight/ocean ton which is a measure of volume (which is also different in the US and UK), and the register ton.

        However I did make a mistake. The wikipedia page I was reading said the weight in t and long tons. I made the mistake of assuming they meant short tons - in reality when measuring displacement for a ship, tonnes are used (which is pretty sensible, considering you’re displacing water and a liter of water to a kilogram of water have a pretty easy conversion formula formula…)

      • Belgdore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 days ago

        Basically. The wings have to be able to bend that much so they don’t break off in strong winds or hard maneuvers.

      • SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, every once in a while the planes need to stretch out. They get tired from being so stiff. This helps their joints later in their life span.

  • passiveaggressivesonar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Airplane engines have deceptively high thrust, imagine each one as a rocket and it’ll start to make sense. The a380 (the big double decker) each engine produces around 350KN. When that thrust is applied to an 80kg human they’ll experience almost 450Gs of force

    In an extreme sense, imagine putting a little rocket engine on a paper airplane which will represent a high thrust to weight ratio

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Your last description is essentially the idea behind the F-117a. That thing isn’t wasn’t flying, it’s it was achieving escape velocity.

  • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m a mechanical engineer and have a general understanding of how wings work. I’ve flown many times. That shit still feels like magic to me.

    • SkyJuice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I was most impressed by the sheer amount of power those engines put out when you finally take off. The acceleration gave me a boost of adrenaline when I flew for the first time (it was a Southwest Boeing 737)

  • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    5 days ago

    “It’s just always exciting! That amazing moment when twelve tonnes of metal leaves the earth… and no-one knows why!”

    “Yes, we do.”

    “Yeah, but, you know, not really. I mean, we know you need wings, and engines, and a sticky-up bit on the end for some reason, but it’s not like we actually know why a plane stays in the air.”

    “No. No, Arthur, we really do! We- we do, we do know that!”

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I don’t know why but I thought that said “Archie” instead of “Arthur”, and read that as Archie and Edith Bunker…and it kind of worked. From the later seasons, when Edith was getting sick of his shit.

  • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    The wings are crazy ! They look way too flimsy for what they do.

    Next time you see an airplane, imagine a crane picking it up by the wings, around the middle of the wing length, and then start shaking it up.

    It does not look like the wing will be able to hold that much weight.

  • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    I find it equally neat how displacement allows a 100,000 ton ship to float.

    As I’m sure most know, planes fly because of the angle of their wings and airframe shape (also known as an airfoil). As moving air flows over the wing it creates downward pressure, which, as a result of Newton’s 3rd law (reaction to a force), allows moving air below to create lift. And upsy daisy she goes.

    Science.

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I think whoever doesn’t look up as they hear a plane or helicopter flying is insane. Ever since as a child I have looked up.

  • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Consider the amount of air its wings must displace in order to stay aloft. An equal quantity of mass at least. It’s passing through that air and, partly pushing it down, but also partially scraping it thin over the bowed top surface of the wing (the Bernoulli principle) which creates a pressure differential that lifts the wing, pulling it upward through suction, and thus the plane. That’s why the plane must go fast to fly, and why it “stalls” and falls if it isn’t moving through enough air. It’s also how turbulence affects a plane. Differences in air pressure mean that in pockets of low pressure there isn’t as much mass being displaced by the wings, not enough lift so it falls.

    Now, it’s quite likely that my layman’s comprehension of this is flawed. But I’m sure it’s entirely possible that someone will correct me soon :3

      • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        I fully expect to come back to lemmy in 48 hours to find a fascinatingly detailed and viciously incisive rebuttal that calls me at least three slurs in the first paragraph, sprinkles additional passive aggressive repudiations of my character throughout, and finishes with a tactical f-bomb too :D

    • NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      To be pedantic: It’s not necessarily an equal amount of mass, it just has to accelerate (this includes deceleration which is acceleration opposing a component of a vector of travel) any amount of mass along and opposite to the vector of the plane’s acceleration due to gravity so long as the amount of mass (and the averaged amount of that mass’ acceleration in the aforementioned direction i.e. force) is in ratio with the planes mass and it’s acceleration due to gravity.

      There’s a lot of other pedantic caveats but they’d make this comment far too long. The main thing I want to convey is that mass doesn’t necessarily matter but rather force (m*v) and also that the “suction” and thereby acceleration that a plane’s airfoil experiences is also it causing an acceleration on the air around it by decelerating it along the path that it wants to flow. It all depends on frame of reference.

      I suck at explaining things, this video might do a better job at getting the idea across.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s magical, right? It’s what got me interested in aviation - the physics, the science, the engineering to make it work. And we’ve gotten so good at it, air travel is now available to most people, it’s safe and convenient.

    I’ve flown exactly three times in my life: a hot air balloon, a helicopter and a DC3. Each was magical in its own way. I’ve also done a fair bit of plane spotting. Seeing an Airbus A380 landing right in front of you is amazing. It really is the size of a large apartment block with wings. Truly awe inspiring.

    Aviation is fucking awesome!

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      You’ve flown or you’ve flown in? Presumable the former, but I know people from where I’m from use flown to mean flown in. If you’ve only been airborne three times, and all in separate crafts, that’s something special in and of itself.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Flown in, as a passenger. I’d have said ‘piloted’ if I was the pilot.

        And yes, that’s an odd trio of aircraft, considering most people only really fly on airliners. I’ve been on a Boeing 747 in a museum, but have never flown in an airliner.

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ve only been in a helicopter once, but that was the coolest. Parasailing being pulled by a boat was also very fun.

      • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I really enjoyed my helicopter ride as well - a sightseeing flight on vacation. That was on a Schweitzer S300; a small helicopter with a bench seat in the front. So you’re sitting right next to the pilot with an almost unobstructed forward vision. So cool. Definitely not something for people with a fear of heights.