“never plug extension cords into extension cords” is probably the most common piece of electrical related advice I’ve ever heard. But if you have, say, 2 x 2m long extension cords, and you plug one into the other, why is that considered a lot more unsafe than just using a single 4 or 5 meter cord?

Does it just boil down to that extra connection creating another opportunity for the prongs to slip out and cause a spark or short circuit? Or is there something else happening there?

For that matter - why aren’t super long extension cords (50 or more meters) considered unsafe? Does that also just come down to a matter of only having 2 connections versus 4 or more on a daisy chained cord?

Followup stupid question: is whatever causes piggybacked extension cords to be considered unsafe actually that dangerous, or is it the sort of thing that gets parroted around and misconstrued/blown out of proportion? On a scale from “smoking 20 packs of cigarettes a day” to “stubbing your toe on a really heavy piece of furniture”, how dangerous would you subjectively rate daisy chaining extension cords, assuming it was only 1 hop (2 extension cords, no more), and was kept under 5 or 10 metres?

I’m sure there’s probably somebody bashing their head against a wall at these questions, but I’m not trying to be ignorant, I’m just curious. Thank you for tolerating my stupid questions

  • BillibusMaximus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    10 days ago

    The longer the distance, the larger the diameter of the wire you need, due to resistance/heat.

    Typically, extension cords are going to be manufactured with the thinnest wire they can get away with based on the safety requirements, in order to save on materials cost.

    So plugging 2 short cords together might cover the same distance as 1 longer cord, but the longer cord will use thicker wire to maintain the proper margin of safety.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Said another way: Each cable is given the minimum copper and shielding that cable needs for the length it is made.

      As soon as you plug two together, you’re operating at greater resistance than either one was made for, and relying on the margin of error.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 days ago

      But unless coiled up on the ground the longer cable also has more area to dissipate heat, so the longer cable doesn’t change anything here. The heat output will be consistent for any section of the cable no matter how much more cable there is on easier side of it.

      The only think that the different resistance would affect is the voltage drop to the end device. But voltage drop varies wildly so you are unlikely to have a meaningful difference caused by a few extension cords (unless maybe you are already a bad case like an apartment building to start).

      • Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Resistance of a cable is (resistivity x Length)/(πr^2) so the residence increases with length, which is why longer extension cords are designed thicker to reduce resistance. Power grids are voltage stabilized so the voltage drop will be negligible but it will take more power to get down the daisy chain, producing more heat.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          And temperature difference to ambient temperature is thermal resistivity * dissipated power / (2\*π\*radius\*length). If you will plug dissipated power = resistance * current^2 and resistance into it, you will see, that temperature difference is invariant of length.

      • HeckGazer@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        The longer wire (being also thicker) has less resistance and is therefore wasting less power as heat, that’s where the Voltage drop is going.

        Sure, most of the time it’s fine if you know what you’re doing, but that’s why it’s general wisdom and not a hard rule, like “don’t put metal in the microwave”, it’s said to protect those that have no idea what they’re doing/why the saying exists

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Distance by itself would be no different than a single cord of the same length.

      However, connection points are areas of localized resistance where connectors meet. This can introduce dangerous areas.

      That said, those aren’t really the problem here:

      The practical, human, problem here is important. Connectors come loose, which makes them dangerous. The majority of this thread is treating this question like a paper test problem, when in reality there are other factors that outweigh the “under ideal circumstances” problem.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      The longer the wire, the more heat it can dissipate, so no, you don’t need wire to be thicker.

      • gazter@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Not sure if you’ve ever used fuse wire before. It’s what was used before capsule fuses and breakers. Essentially, if too much current goes through it, it will melt, breaking the circuit as protection. The thicker the fuse wire, the more current it can pass through without melting. The length of the wire doesn’t come into it. 1cm of 10 amp fuse wire will melt at the same current as 1 meter of 10 amp fuse wire.

          • gazter@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            We may be discussing slightly different things here, I’m not sure if I follow the application of your math in this context.

            My point is that a thinner wire will get much hotter than a thicker wire, given the same amount of current. Is this not the case?

            • uis@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Correct. And temperature does not depend on length. We already said it.

    • Baku@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      This, along with hotels that hide their only power point behind the bed but have 50 bloody phone jacks, are my pet peeves. But it kinda makes sense when you consider they were mostly built before the days of having a ton of devices in the bedroom. A lamp and alarm clock, maybe a TV if you’re well off, would’ve been perfectly fine for a lot of people

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        10 days ago

        The absolute worst is when the Word Documents are stashed away in some random drawer. Or when you find an Excel spreadsheet under the mattress!

        • kungen@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 days ago

          Not so awful, but it’s disappointing when you open the drawer expecting a Bible, but there’s only OneNote there.

        • Baku@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          I really wish my autocorrect would stop doing that. I can count on one hand the amount of times I’ve actually wanted to write “PowerPoint”. I couldn’t even count on 10 hands the amount of times it’s assumed I’m some kind of idiot that doesn’t know “PowerPoint” is a single word when I type “power point”

      • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I once read a theory on an electricians forum about how the USA electrical code’s mandated maximum distance between adjacent outlets on a wall, coupled with the typical bedroom layout, as well as home builders trying to be as cheap as possible, led to only a single outlet being placed directly in the middle of the longest wall. This is also the most logical position for a bed, so the theory is that the bed pressing against the outlet over time was a contributing factor to electrical-related house fires.

        I cannot find where I read that originally, and certainly the granularity of nationally-reported fire data is not sufficient to prove that theory. And while the electrical code’s distance requirements haven’t changed, more homes will now put enough outlets so the only one isn’t behind the bed.

    • Boozilla@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 days ago

      Years ago, I used to play live music. We played in a lot of shitty dive bars. Thinking back on all the ancient decrepit plugs we used to power our instruments, amplifiers, and stage lights with…it’s a miracle we never started a fire. Nightmare fuel now that I’m older and a little bit wiser.

  • JordanZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Others have pretty much mentioned it. Too thin of conductors for the total length required which can overload the cable and heat it up. If you’re just charging your phone it’s unlikely to cause a problem but the more amps you pull the riskier it gets.

    Here’s a helpful chart…

    Edit: Even at harbor freight (cheap hardware store) a 50ft 12 gauge extension cord is about $40 and weighs 7 pounds.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      10 days ago

      lol “gauge”

      americans will use anything except the metric system

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        16 AWG – 1.3 mm^2
        14 AWG – 2 mm^2
        12 AWG – 3.3 mm^2
        10 AWG – 5.2 mm^2

        For us from the civilised part of the world ;-)

        However, as in Europe we have 230 V system, approximately half the cross section, as stated in the table above, is sufficient.

        Edit: This is how the above text should be displayed:
        Screenshot_20241227-221529_Eternity_1

      • Thavron@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’ve always found gauge to be especially odd, because the number gets smaller as you go bigger, so at one point you can’t go any further even though you can go fatter.

          • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yup, I work with 4/0 (0000) cable pretty regularly, for things like generators or powering large systems. We have a few trunks full of cable, and it takes a crew of 2 or 3 to actually lay it because it’s so heavy. Usually one person pushing the trunk along, one focuses on uncoiling it from the trunk, and one focuses on actually laying the cable. We use five conductors at a time (one neutral, three 120v hots leads, and a ground,) so it’s a big bundle. Each cable weighs a little over a pound per foot, and there are five bundled together. So a 150’ coil can easily weigh 750-800 pounds.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 days ago

      Is it just me or is anyone else perturbed that the cable sizes in this infographic are all the same gauge?

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        the cable sizes in this infographic are all the same gauge?

        They’re not. They are clearly marked as different gauges, except the left most two which have different plug types… one is two prong, the other is three prong.

      • Mesophar@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Do you just mean the art showing them as the same size? Because that’s common in a lot of infovraphics to not be to scale if they are clearly labeled

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 days ago

      a 50ft 12 gauge extension cord is about $40

      $40USD would be $58CAD.

      A 50-ft 12-gauge extension cord costs $112+ CAD anywhere in Canada. A 100-ft is $200+ CAD. Like… fffffuuuuuck.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      It doesn’t make sense. Temperature difference does not depends on length.

  • Free_Opinions@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    Related thing about extension cable reels that many don’t know is that even if you need like 3 meters of cable you should still unspool the entire thing as otherwise it’s acting as a coil and creating resistance heat. Most cable reels have different ratings marked on them for when they are spooled / unspooled. This is especially true when the device you’re powering takes >1000 watts

    • modeler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 days ago

      Many years ago, my mother used the electric lawn mower without unspooling all the wire. When it finally shorted, all the plastic wire insulation was in the process of turning into a melty plastic soup. A Lesson Was Learned.

      The reason isn’t resistance - it’s that the coiled wire makes an electromagnet that stores energy in the magnetic field. The alternating current in the mains switches 50 or 60 times a second. In each cycle the magnetic field is created, destroyed then recreated in the opposite direction, then destroyed. This dumps a lot of energy (and therefore heat) into the coil.

      • brown567@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        The coil wouldn’t make a significant magnetic field because the cable has two wires with opposite current flow in close proximity

        But when the cable is coiled, its ability to dissipate heat is less, so normal resistive heating can create higher temperatures

  • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 days ago

    First, I’m not an electrician, or anything even vaguely approaching one.

    I’ve never heard that advice with extension cords, only power strips.

    You could theoretically link enough extension cords together to cause problems, but it would need to be some extremely shit extension cords or a LOT of them. Resistance increases over distance, which in power cables manifests as them getting hotter. That isn’t a problem until all the sudden it is a problem.

    For power strips, the main danger is that you’re potentially introducing more outlets than any of them are rated for. If you’re just using 2 3ft power bars to functionally make a 6ft cable that you’re only plugging a single thing into… you’re fine. Or at least I was, idk I did it for like a whole year. If you’re plugging 16 things into a single wall outlet via power strips you can trip the circuit breaker, or potentially much worse stuff can happen like things getting melty and starting a fire.

    If you know enough of what you’re doing to math out the power draw+what your outlet/power strips are rated for you can pretty (afaik) safely daisy chain them if you wanna.

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yeah, there are two components here

      1. Adding extra length.
      2. Adding more outlets.

      2 is the main problem, but you need a little of 1 to have it fail in an unsafe way (ie. not just tripping the circuit breaker).

      If you just add a lot of extra outlets and plug lots of stuff in then you will simply trip the circuit breaker. (Assuming that everything is properly set up according to code.) In order to create a problem you need some extra wiring that is rated for less load than the wall wiring. (Now in practice every splitter has some amount of wiring, so these can be the same device, but most power bars are rated to be “fully used” or have a fuse internally). So the problem looks something like this:

      1. Have a 20A wall circuit.
      2. Plug a 10A extension cord into it.
      3. Plug a power bar or other splitter into the extension cord.
      4. Put enough devices into the splitter to generate 15A of current.

      Now you are overloading the extension cord and risking fire.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    On a scale from “smoking 20 packs of cigarettes a day” to “stubbing your toe on a really heavy piece of furniture”, how dangerous would you subjectively rate daisy chaining extension cords

    As dangerous as one extension cord of their combined length. Don’t forget to verify that every cord rating is above load rating. I recommend to use at least same rating as circuit breaker or get extension cord with circuit breaker built in and never decrease rating down the line without circuit breaker before it, so even if you somehow overload it, there will be protection from it.

    AND NEVER COIL OR THERMALY INSULATE! Cords rely on convection for heat dissipation, and spooling and insulating reduces it, thus increasing electrical insulator temperature until it melts and spontaneously combusts. This applies to extension cords in general.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because this is the Internet, I’ll be pedantic and say the interface where each cord plugs into the next probably adds some resistance as well.

      So, 50 cords 1 ft each plugged into each other would have a higher resistance than the same wire at a single 50ft length.

      I doubt it really matters in the practical terms of your answer and the question being asked though.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    Connectors come loose, which makes them dangerous.

    They are uninsulated points that allow water and material ingress, and can partially or fully pull apart, causing arching. Which can cause combustion.

    This is the main reason these are dangerous, which the majority of this entire thread misses. The added length or connector resistance is somewhat negligible here unless you’re daisy chaining long conductors, which often isn’t the case for in-home extensions.

  • litchralee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    I’m not trying to be ignorant, I’m just curious.

    I think you’re in the right community! Don’t let anyone tell you to shy away from asking curious questions. (well, unless the question is also bigoted, illegal, baiting, sealioning, or otherwise disingenuous)

    I’m not an electrician in any jurisdiction, but one answer for why two 2-meter (~6 ft) extension cords in series is inadvisable compared to a single 4 meter cord is that it’s not an apples-to-apples comparison. Longer cords necessarily have to be built differently than shorter cords, not only because of electrical codes (eg the NEC in USA) or product safety specs (eg UL, CSA) but also being well-designed for their expected use. There’s also the human aspect, which all good designs must account for as well.

    Here in the USA, common extension cord lengths are ~2 m (6 ft), ~7.5 m (25 ft), ~15 m (50 ft), and ~30 m (100 ft). Of those cords, the common wire gauge used might be 18 AWG (~1 mm^2), 14 AWG (~2 mm^2), 16 AWG (~1.5 mm^2), and 12 AWG (~3.5 mm^2). I’ve intentionally rounded the metric units so they’re more analogous to common wire gauges outside the USA. Finally, the insulation used can be anything from “thin, indoor only” to “heavy, abrasion and sunlight resistant”. And while the USA technically has a boat-load of AC connectors, the grand majority will use the standard 2-pin or 3-pin 120v connector, formally known as NEMA 1-15 and NEMA 5-15 respectively. What this means is that chaining extension cords is both possible and somewhat common. The problem is one of mismatched designs.

    From a cursory search on the website of a major USA home improvement store, the smallest wire gauge used for a 100 ft cable is 16 AWG. The largest is 10 AWG (nb: smaller numbers mean bigger wire). That thinner cable is marketed for outdoor use. The thicker cable indicates its use “indoor/outdoor” and for heavy-duty applications. It is also branded with a major power-tool company, which would be appropriate as power tools often draw high current.

    Whereas looking at 6 ft extension cords, most are 16 AWG but a few were 18 AWG (thinner than 16) or 14 AWG (thicker). But I could not find any thicker cables than that, certainly nothing that uses 10 AWG (~6 mm^2). The “heavy duty” cables of this length also used only 16 AWG wire.

    Because electrical resistance is additive in series, and because Ohm’s Law governs the voltage lost at the end of a cord, the use of insufficiently large conductors can cause voltage issues for high-current appliances. Appliances for USA-spec generally require 120 Volts +/- 10%, with utilities aiming to provide 120 Volts +/- 5% from the outlets. This means a “sufficient” power cord should not have a voltage drop of more than 6 volts, give or take. Of course, a high-current appliance will also cause a larger voltage drop than a low-current device, so we only consider the former case.

    For a machine that draws 12 Amps attached to a 100 ft extension cord made of 18 AWG wire, the voltage drop would be 15 volts. This is bad for the machine, which now sees a lower voltage than expected. Had the cord been made of 12 AWG wire, the drop is an acceptable 3 volts.

    So if you’re operating construction tools, it would be a terrible idea to use three random 6-ft cables, and you should instead use a single 25-ft cable. Even though it’s longer than you need, the fact is that most 25 ft cables use thicker conductors, which reduces the voltage drop overall.

    But there’s also that peaky human factor. Sure, there would also be more connectors which could come loose, but the really pressing issue with daisy chained cords is when people do that indoors, because they only have light-duty 6 ft cables handy. And for that Christmas tree, they need to use attach three cables together to go beneath the hallway rug.

    This is essentially the worst-case scenario: using thin conductor cords, with thin insulation, underneath very flammable household surfaces, which are also trodden upon by foot traffic. Every step on that cord weakens the insulation and fatigues the conductors. Over time, the conductor becomes thinner where it’s being fatigued, and this increases the voltage drop. An unfortunate result of a voltage drop is that it generates heat. For a cable which is uniformly thin, this heat is spread over the whole length. But for localized conductor damage, the heat is pin-point… directly under a flammable rug.

    In the USA, some 3300 house fires started from an extension cord. Because these cords are not within the walls, they are usually beyond the control of often-strict building/electrical codes, something that’s been critiqued by a prominent YouTuber. The US CPSC even goes so far as to create memes to promote their messaging that space heaters – a common, high-current appliance – should not be used with extension cords or strips.

    CPSC meme about space heaters

    Of course, from an electrical perspective, even a ten-long chain of dinky extension cords would have no problem powering just a single LED night light. But it’s reasonable to ask: 1) is this just asking to be struck down by fate, 2) are there better alternatives like thicker/longer cords, and 3) why isn’t there an outlet where you need it?

    (There’s also a scenario where too long or thin of an extension cord can cause a circuit breaker to fail to trip during a short circuit, but it’s fairly esoteric and this post is quite long now)

    In short, the blanket recommendation to avoid daisy-chaining cords is to avoid the nasty and sometimes fatal results when that can go wrong, even with it might not always play out that way. There’s almost always something safer than can be done than daisy chaining.

  • Boozilla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 days ago

    The smart answer: it can start a fire, don’t do it.

    The honest answer: I’ve done it a zillion times and never started a fire. I buy heavy 12 and 10 gauge cords and only chain them to power things that don’t require a lot of amps, like LED lights.

    When in doubt, a plug-in power meter is an option you can use to help monitor the situation. Plugs that draw a lot of amps can get warm, even when not using an extension cord. Also, it’s not uncommon for a device to pull a lot of amps on initial power-up, and then settle down to a lower draw.

  • DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    Resistance increases over longer distance cable, and increased load from appliances. (Especially don’t with american electrics, they aren’t fused so the wire can overheat and set fire to the surroundings.)

    • kevincox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      To clarify a bit, the benefit of the UK system isn’t the end device having a fuse, but the cable itself having a fuse.

      In the US the setup would be something like

      1. Wall has 20A wiring.
      2. Electrical panel has 20A fuse to avoid the wire in the wall from overheating.
      3. Extension cord is designed for 10A
      4. You plug in 2 10A devices to the extension cord.
      5. The wall wiring is fine, it can take 20A.
      6. The circuit breaker doesn’t trip as it is also 20A.
      7. The extension cord overheats and starts a fire.

      In the UK the 10A extension cord will have its own 10A fuse in the plug. So when you turn on the two 10A devices the fuse in the extension cord will blow and prevent the extension cord from overheating.

      • clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 days ago

        Bold of you to assume that the wall outlet would have a 20a breaker. Most don’t, unless they’re in a kitchen.

        But you’re right about the resistance. Also, most extension cords are undersized for the loads they pull, they’re commonly made with 16 or even 18awg wire, further increasing resistance (which translates to heat).

        Source: am electrician in US

        • kevincox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          The circuit power doesn’t matter for the example. I was just picking easy numbers. You can have the same problem as long as the rating of the extension cord is less than the circuit breaker. (And as you pointed that out this is a very common case due to the frequently low rating of extension cords.)

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    I would also like to hear an expert opinion on this. Never really made sense to me either, but it also doesn’t sound unreasonable.

    • Baku@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think that would be more relevant to power boards than extension cords. Unless nomenclature is different elsewhere, extension cords here generally only have a single plug. Although there are usually warnings to not run things like clothes dryers or portable stovetops through an extension cord because it can apparently melt the cable. Truthfully, I don’t entirely get that either, as I would’ve assumed they’d be built to the same standard as internal wiring

        • Baku@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 days ago

          Ah, no worries! I’m not sure if it’s even universally agreed upon across native English speakers. Where I’m from though, a powerboard (or power strip in other parts of the world) has one plug that then leads on to usually 4 or more additional power points/sockets. An extension cord on the other hand usually only allows a single device be connected to it (whether that’s another extension cord or something else)

  • borZ0 the t1r3D b3aR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 days ago

    I have an RV with 2x 10 gauge, 50’ extensions running power to it. I have a built-to-purpose coverat the connection point. Its fine and safe enough. Just keep slack at the connection. It cant be under pull stress.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    Extension cords are rated for certain levels of resistive load based on their length. It typically has to do with the gauge of the wire used in the chord itself. Electrical resistance is typically converted into heat energy. If you daisy chain extension cords and have them plugged into appliances, then the resistive load of the chained cords can be higher than the rating of one or more of the extension cords. This can cause fire.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 days ago

    “never plug extension cords into extension cords” is probably the most common piece of electrical related advice I’ve ever heard.

    Same reason power cables outside are fucking huge and the cord to your TV is tiny.

    Electrical loss generates heat, so the longer the cable, the thicker it needs to be before that heat is too much.

    Don’t forget a filament in an old school light bulb is just really thin wite. The thinner it is the less energy required to make it glow, which is why there’s like a 200 year old light bulb still going, it’s just a thick filament and very inefficient

    So I’d never plug two of those rinky dink indoor extension cords together, it doesn’t take much length before it starts “glowing” like a light bulb filament, which happens at the plug and can burn a house down.

    But…

    Growing up doing rural construction with heavy gauge extension cords we never thought twice about hooking multiples up as long as it was just something quick for a few minutes at a time. Then never left it plugged into the source when not in use. You’d never do it for like a radio even because eventually it’s gonna heat up back at the aource.

    Someone else already mentioned not pulling it right, we’d “doughnut” the connection so that if it did get yanked accidentally it wouldn’t unplug, but obviously it can’t be under constant stress even like that.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      So many people here talk about the thickness needed of else it heats up. That is simply wrong. The heat is the same per length and is dissipated the same way with twice the length aka the temperature is the same*. The issue is that the short circuit current could drop below the value needed to actually pop the breaker, allowing for a ton of heat to be generated where it shouldn’t be. The same way a light bulb glows bright hot but does not trip the breaker etc., now just imagine the cable to be the glowing part.

      *There is another issue if you do not lay them out, that the heat has nowhere to go. Causing coiled wires to have a far lower rating compared to when they are fully extended.