• EvilBit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    258
    ·
    6 days ago

    No responsible board should sell as much as a paper clip to this sociopathic weenis piss baby.

    • breakingcups@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      119
      ·
      6 days ago

      Now give me an example of a corporate board at Intel’s scale being responsible when given the choice between being responsible or buttloads of short-term profits.

    • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      What? It worked out for Twitter shareholders though.

      What bothers me about all these political posts is when people act surprised when profit seeking people act purely in their self interest.

      I agree it’s bad, but it’s weird to be constantly mad about things so obvious like parasites acting parasitically.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Responsible to who?
      Of course they will sell if there’s a profit to be made. Companies exist to make profits, if they can make a profit from it, it’s actually their responsibility to the shareholders to do it.

      Maybe you mean responsible in some way that has to do with morals, but if you think morals apart from staying within the law, have any say in this whatsoever, you are being very naive. That’s not at all how the system works.

      That said I don’t see any other way than corruption for Musk to be interested. Musk buys Intel, and Trump doubles the subsidies to Intel and give them extra sweet government contracts. And everybody profit, except the stupid taxpayers including those that voted Trump.

      Only the law helps super capitalist narcissists to stay at least somewhat within moral norms.
      And in USA the law doesn’t even count anymore. So there you go, everything is fucked up, until Americans figure it out. Which means it will be fucked up for a loooong time.

      • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yeah.

        And there’s a very good chance that Elon spends his waning years in and out of every court, trying to stay out of jail.

        Source: Rockefeller’s biography.

        And that’s actually the optimistic version, from Elon’s perspective. There’s been plenty of rich assholes in history that didn’t have to worry about the courts.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 days ago

          Not doing to happen in this political climate. The robber barons has nothing in the tech companies.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          I mean really depends whether or not he manages to continue to succesfully own the US government. He made basically statements along the lines of if trump loses the election he could go to jail. I assume he’s betting on either the trump administration killing democracy… or being able to buy the next election too. Or perhaps just often enough that the supreme court never gets fixed.

          • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Yeah. Rockefeller pretty much owned the government in his heyday, too.

            And then at some point he didn’t anymore. Money can buy power, but it does run out eventually.

            Rockefeller was a lot smarter than Musk, and got a bit ahead of it with publicity stunt donations, before his influence ran out.

            Musk thinks he can achieve a better outcome by controlling the media or the courts.

            I think it’s objectively true that controlling the media does work, but I also think Musk wildly overestimates his own competence, and is in for a worse time than Rockefeller had.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      He hasn’t bought it yet, maybe everyone else will stay buying Intel stocks after this news and it’ll get too expensive for him.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      If Intel didn’t have yield issues for over a decade, wouldn’t they be much further ahead than AMD by now?

      Kinda weird how their production problems conveniently coincide with what will keep them “neck n’ neck” with the competition for as long as possible.

      • dai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Intel made some massive mistakes with their post 14nm nodes, they overextended and fell on their own sword.

        Admittedly what Intel were aiming for with their “10nm” node had higher density than tsmc’s “7nm” (from memory), considering the timeframe that would have been another massive leap for Intel; and if they had pulled it off AMD would be struggling like the bulldozer days.

        22nm to 14nm Intel were on fire, almost seemed untouchable for quite some time. X99 was (in my eyes) the biggest leap in the right direction and probably their best consumer platform ever released. Huge cache, moar cores, pcie lanes for days and a refresh on their latest node (6950x).

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    That would be a HUGE Conflict of Interest if he was also a Government Official overseeing things like Regulation and Contracts! Intel would be his THIRD or FOURTH or FIFTH company that would rely on Government Funding!

  • dfi@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    6 days ago

    This rumor sounds like a crypto pump and dump.

    Please buy Intel stock so we can sell ours!!

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Look at the way Tesla collects and treats customer data, and the way Musk seems to unilaterally abuse his control over the companies he owns for personal reasons.

    Now think about the capabilities of the Intel Management Engine that pretty much every Intel CPU requires.

    Bad vibes, I say.

    For those feeling out of the loop, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine

    Tldr - it’s a little always on processor, running a Minix OS, with direct access to all board devices including the Ethernet Controller.

    AMD has something similar in form of their Platform Security Processor.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 days ago

    If Leon buys Intel, then I will switch permanently to AMD or the loser is playing with the market.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      switch permanently to AMD

      So glad I switched to AM5 on my last main gaming rig rebuild last year lol

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      That’s a silly reason to pick a piece of tech IMO. I buy exclusively AMD because they offer great value, especially since they support their sockets for a long time. For their GPUs, they have fantastic drivers on Linux.

      I honestly don’t care who owns them, I care that the quality is good for the price. I don’t find that to be true for Tesla, so I don’t own one. If he buys Intel, that won’t change my opinion of their products, I’ll still avoid them because he value isn’t there.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Yep. Citizens’ United guaranteed that by allowing corporations to funnel an unlimited amount of money into campaigns.

        Just a heads up, if spending wasting egregious amounts of money didn’t influence the outcome of elections, why would people do it?

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      I thought the cross licensing deal between AMD and Intel basically collapses if one gets bought out?

      So intel wouldn’t be able to make 64 bit processors any more?

    • pineapplepizza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’m the short term it will be good for AMD, in the long term they will lose the need to invest in research and development, start cutting corners and up prices for sub par chips. Bad news for consumers.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 days ago

    Imagine being a business willing to risk everything getting involved with this lunatic lol

    If businesses nowadays were people we’d have interventions for them or lock them up for their own sake.