The Portuguese Air Force is no longer expected to acquire the 5th generation F-35 fighter from Lockheed Martin, all due to the review of the US position towards NATO.

    • Denixen@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      50 minutes ago

      Uses a license produced engine from US (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_RM12), which has caused endless problems in exports for SAAB, since the US blocks them frequently when they are about to win a contract.

      I would go for Rafale or Eurofighter and I am saying this as a swede. We need to replace the engines ASAP. Perhaps a UK, German or French one. Would probably take years to develop thought and likely a significant overhaul will be necessary.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        Well, an easier fix is to just keep using the engine design, and stop paying the license fees.

        What is the US gonna do? Stop supporting NATO? Put tariffs on exports to the EU? Stop being an ally, and ally themselves with Russia?

  • AidsKitty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    It will be good for the USA to not be responsible for 70% of the NATO defense budget. We can close many military bases throughout Europe and pivot to Asia and form new alliances.

    • nomoretwats@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 minutes ago

      70% OF The NatO DefEnSe BudgEt. It’s just subsidies to lockhead martin, idiot.

      I mean the part that isn’t used to murder leftist politicians

  • muddyuk@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Why would anybody feel they can rely on American hardware anymore? Any country with any sense won’t be beholden to them as an ally now thanks to that idiotic mango.

  • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    O mundo já mudou. Houve eleições nos EUA, houve uma posição em relação à NATO e ao mundo, afirmada pelo secretário para a Defesa e pelo próprio Presidente dos EUA, que tem que ser tida em conta também na Europa e no que tem a ver com Portugal.

    E esse nosso aliado, que ao longo de décadas foi sempre previsível, poderá trazer limitações na utilização, na manutenção, nos componentes, em tudo aquilo que tem a ver com a garantia de que as aeronaves serão operacionais e serão utilizadas em todo o tipo de cenários.

    Interview here, in Portuguese.

    The world has already changed. There were elections in the USA, there was a position [change] regarding NATO and the world, stated by both the Defense Secretary and the President of the USA, that has to be taken into account in Europe and in Portugal.

    Our ally, who through decades has always been predictable [as in steadfast], may bring limitations to using, to maintaining, to components, anything that relates to the assurance that the planes are operational and can be used in all types of scenarios.

    For some context, Portugal has an aging fleet of F-16s. The national Air Force wants to replace these with F-35s, but that is no longer likely to happen.

    He was asked if Portugal would instead purchase, for example, French aircraft, but he declined to answer.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yeah I got a sneaking suspicion that LMC’s gonna see a ton of options getting dropped and orders cancelled. Our government is not to be trusted. We’ll use that shit as leverage at some point.

  • Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If we assume that Portugal would have ordered the same number as Czechia (a fellow European country with a pretty close GDP, population, and military budget that already bought F-35s) and take the flyaway cost on wikipedia of $82.500,000 as the price Portugal would have paid per plane, that’s $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn’t get

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      14 hours ago

      that’s $2 billion in sales that Lockheed Martin doesn’t get

      And that’s just the beginning.

      • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

        • PugJesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I feel like billionaires might resolve the Trump/musk issue for us. Fucking with a defense contractor’s bottom line is pretty dangerous, especially when you have private security (Musk)

          Honestly, I feel it’s more likely to display how much the defense industry is just another ordinary industry. They’ll whinge and wring their hands, maybe openly support the limpdick opposition if they’re feeling particularly pressured, but all that experience in making killing machines is just engineering and marketing. They’re not more likely to have clout or death squads (of their own, at least) than other major industries of comparable size and importance, and everything is structured in such a compartmentalized way that they couldn’t really leverage that against the government if they actually wanted to throw down.

          The defense industry is more like the oil industry than a cyberpunk future. Influential, not independent.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              What about the expertise in suiciding whistleblowers?

              Doesn’t Boeing do mostly civilian aircraft?

              • arty@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                They do something for military, so it’s not a docile, purely civilian company

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The funniest possible outcome of this would be Lockheed Martin starting up a Tesla competitor

        • Riddick3001@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Fucking with a defense contractor’s

          Good point. Hadn’t really thought of it that way. What an enormous mess…

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Disclaimer in that I am not in any way an expert on military procurement: it depends on what they buy.

        There are three European planes that can do similar roles: the Typhoon (Anglo-German-Italian), the Rafale (French), and the Gripen (Swedish). According to this RUSI article, it looks like the Typhoon is probably actually more expensive per plane. The Typhoon was also, unlike the other two and the F-35, designed to be a pure air superiority fighter, so it’s more of an F-22 competitor than an F-35 one. Probably not what Portugal is looking for. That RUSI article has the Rafale as being a bit more expensive than the F-35 and the Gripen being a bit cheaper than it. However, the source for the F-35’s number is the flyaway cost for the Americans, who did ordered it in huge numbers and also did most (not all, but most) of the development and I would assume get a better deal than others. Further, it’s in an article headlined “F-35’s price might rise, Lockheed warns”. So I’m just going to hedge my bets and say:

        • If they buy the Typhoon, definitely no, but the Typhoon probably isn’t the right fit anyway
        • If they buy the Rafale, somewhere around the same, and it’ll still be extremely capable
        • If they buy the Gripen, yes, and it’ll still be very good but not quite individually capable as the other options
        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          That’s all well and good, but you’re also missing a critical point.

          The European Union is very likely to introduce a bill that will massively subsidize purchases of local (EU) military equipment. This will make all EU alternatives much, much more attractive than F-35s.

          This is a great move by the EU - it drives a lot of military spending away from the US and into the local economies, while shoring up its own security as well as preventing being at the hands of a fickle fascist for maintenance and upgrades.

        • baerd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 hours ago

          For once, our (Croatian) government lucked into making a good choice when they went with Rafales instead of F-16Vs.

          • Skua@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Uhh, don’t expect any special insights here

            It looks to me like it’s pretty impressive considering that it’s the second combat plane ever built in the country, and the experience gained from that is a valuable thing.

            I have to assume that it’s less capable and less expensive than the four that I mentioned, based on how it has fared as an export. It seems to have struggled against the European, American, and Chinese offerings, or in many cases have been considered as a trainer by countries that are already flying one of those previously-mentioned ones. Obviously there’s a lot of politics involved in these purchases, but if Australia has already bought F-35s and wants Tejases as trainers then it suggests that Australia has a good reason to think that Tejas is a lot less expensive and also less effective at actually fighting a war

            It seems like it suits its role well, though - a cost-effective solution for India’s needs, and a way to develop domestic expertise

  • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Portugal was lucky to get quite late aboard the F35 ship, as they decided about it as late as April 2024. Finland, where I’m from, was one of the earliest ones, deciding about the procurement in late 2022. Some other ones, as told by Wikipedia:

    Canada: Jan 2023 Czechia: Jan 2024 Germany: 2023 Greece: Delivery 2027, so ordered probably in late 2023 or so? Poland: 2020, apparently some already delivered? Romania: November 2024 Singapore: Early 2024 Switzerland: delivery from 2027, so probably ordered in late 2023?

    The further the procurement process, the more money might get wasted if the order has to be cancelled. Would still make sense to cancel, though, because a weapon you are free to use as long as there is no war is just a heap of scrap metal. It does not matter how much money we’ve already spent on the scrap metal, we should not put a cent more.

  • perestroika@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    It’s migration season, and this is only the first bird - I predict there’s more of them.

    I think we have an interesting conflict of interest on the US side of the ocean: “the US military industrial complex” vs. “Trump, driving away their customers”.

    • Delta_V@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      14 hours ago

      US MIC: “I wish the Feds would buy more guns and less butter.”

      *monkey paw curls*

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      For them it is easier, because as I understand they didn’t sign any contract yet, just were planning to.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Yea, imagine getting a brand-new fleet of F-35s and then king trump wakes up and has them bricked to blitz-annex the Azores.

      • ubergeek@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        Money well spent. But, frankly, who is that 500 million to? What happens if… They just don’t pay? I mean, Trump is very familiar with just not paying bills owed, maybe Canada should just… Return in kind?

  • PNW_Doug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Good for them. It’s clear that we (the U.S.) can no longer be trusted to act in good faith.