America has always rejected fanaticism, especially since WWII. We are supposed to be E pluribus unum – out of many, ONE. Now, the right wants America to be E unum pluribus – out of ONE, many.

  • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    They love money, are afraid of losing a single cent of it, and want to control the government so they have to pay as little taxes as possible. That’s it. Everything else, the culture war stuff, is just to get the stupid poors to vote against their self interest.

  • GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    The rejection of fanaticism went out the door along with E Pluribus Unum in the 50’s when the Christian nationalists forced their religion on the national motto. Then over the next decade black people were lynched and attacked with fire hoses when they were asking for basic rights.

    They also started conversion camps where they emotionally and sometimes physically and secually abuse minors in conversion camps to attempt to change sexual orientation.

    I believe it was Nixon who helped foem fox News to pull the Republicans further right and we’ve been seeing the consequences of that.

    Basically the fanaticism has always been there, but with the internet and social media, it’s easier for them to make their voice heard.

    • cmeu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Yep this. They are afraid that their way of life is being threatened… Just like the other fanatics There are religious fanatics, sporta fanatics, Independent fanatics prepping for the aliens to come and kill them, etc. Mobs are dangerous no matter the flag they wave.

  • qooqie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The why is kind of hard to pin point and I would probably say someone with a higher degree in poli sci could answer better.

    However, I just wanted to point out that they don’t see it as fanatical. They truly believe the left to be evil and doing demonic rituals. I’m almost willing to say they have delusional disorder or symptoms of light psychosis. Shits wack

    • treefrog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Here I think it’s best to delineate the GOP base and the GOP elite.

      What you say is most likely (though not always) true for the base. While not likely (though sometimes) true for the elite.

      And it’s not a delusional disorder. But the effects of propaganda by the elite. (Still technically delusion but I think it’s nice to point at the source, as it helps us not fall into the trap of blaming people for being manipulated).

      The reason we see more of this recently in broad daylight is because propaganda works. The oligarchs and political elite care about the same things they did during WW2, money and power. And up until Pearl Harbor, there was support for Germany in the U.S.

      https://time.com/5414055/american-nazi-sympathy-book/

      And don’t forget, the GOP has a history of shitting on minorities that goes back many generations. This isn’t new. It’s just masks off. Because their base drank the kool aid.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s also worth mentioning that Russia and China have been caught manipulating online conversations, spreading misinformation, etc. The USA does it too, and probably a lot of countries. One of the most effective ways to gain geopolitical ground is to spread political division within your rival.

    Internet makes that easy, especially when profits line up. Creating information bubbles and ragebait pays the bills.

  • bastion@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s kinda funny how fanatically people point out that it’s the other side that’s the problem.

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Get out of here with your “both sides” garbage.

      I’ve never had someone left of center tell me a whole group of people deserve to be locked up or killed. I had a right wing nut tell me just yesterday that all lgbtq folk are complicit in rape and pedophilia and deserve to be hanged. Sadly, that’s not even close to the only time someone has said that to me.

      Both sides might be part of the problem here, but only one side is off their fucking rockers.

  • D1stractableSocSci@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    Buddy sent me this link. I’m a professional social scientist who works in this area. There’s a lot, but I’m gonna focus on two things.

    1. Donald Trump, 2) Slanted elections
    1. Donald Trump. He has been the de-facto party leader since his nomination for the presidency in 2016. He has repeatedly endorsed and encouraged violence among his supporters, culminating with the January 6 Capitol Attack. And he hasn’t stopped. (The opinions and beliefs of leadership trickle down to shape the beliefs of their supporters–see an example here. Despite many of their misgivings, one of three things happened to Trump’s GOP opponents: -A) They voluntarily left elected office (Bob Corker) -B) They were punished for criticizing him (Liz Cheney), or -C) They fell in-line (Ted Cruz). Those who left the GOP or were forced out have been replaced by more extreme leaders yet–folks like Marjorie Taylor Greene. Few left in the GOP openly challenge Trump because they’ve seen what happens to those who do. So there’s no one of much influence within the GOP capable of leading a credible anti-Trump charge.
    2. The GOP is better shielded from the electoral consequences of extremism than Democrats. Owing to aggressive partisan gerrymandering after Republicans swept statehouses in 2010, MANY state and U.S. House districts were drawn to maximize the number of uncompetitive elections that would all but ensure Republican majorities. You see this in many states that are very competitive at the state level like North Carolina and Wisconsin, but Republicans have locked up enough statehouse seats to retain control of legislatures, even when most of the state’s vote went to Democrats. Uncompetitive elections mean that incompetent, corrupt, and extreme candidates who alienate most voters can still defeat moderate consensus-builders. What happens is Democrats have to run candidates with exceptional cross-appeal (i.e., moderate consensus-builders) if they want even slim electoral wins. Meanwhile, Republicans can hold onto those majorities without having to moderate.
    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      first-past-the-post voting artificially limits the number of viable political parties. This reduces the competition in the electoral system, reducing the quality of the representation across the political spectrum.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    5 days ago

    You can go back as far as you want but I think the current situation is because they got routed in the 2008 election and decided that openly courting the worst people in society was their only option. There’s always been racists and conspiracy theorists in America — see The John Birch Society, for one of many examples — but parties didn’t openly court them, at least without plausible deniability. Maybe a wink and a nod but not open courtship.

    So, after 2008, Republicans started saying the quiet parts out loud because they were desperate. They — especially Mitch McConnell, in my opinion — thought they could control the beast they unleashed but, it turns out, that isn’t how unleashing beasts works. It started with the Tea Party and pretty quickly escalated into a situation where “moderate Republican” became an oxymoron. And then Trump came along yelling the formerly quiet parts and that was that.

    • Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Add to that that they simply don’t have any rational arguments. They have no program and no plan. On most real issues there is a broad consensus among the American public towards progressive positions. All the right wingers have is hate, resentment and weaponised stupidity.

    • Jordan117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      IMHO 2012 was the one that really broke their brains. The tea party types tried to get various firebrands on the ticket, but end up having to support Romney. Hey, at least he’s a squeaky-clean telegenic millionaire pushing the most severe conservative fiscal policies! Proceeds to get stomped by the Obama campaign so bad that Karl Rove couldn’t believe it as it was happening. THEN the establishment GOP flirts with moving to the center on immigration. The backlash against that on the right, supercharged by the mainstreaming of mobile social media (plus social justice protests and the looming Clinton campaign) was what fueled the rise of Trump.

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    why? because it’s all they have left.

    demographics are changing. their population is aging. their kids hate the way they live and move away.

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Because Conservativism is not an ideology. It’s narcissism dressed in a stoic costume. Conservatives believe themselves to be righteous, so they support policies and legislation that benefit themselves. They gain followers by promoting a sense of belonging so they can defend the self and attack the other. There is no lie to brazen, no hypocrisy too obvious, no depth too low for a conservative seeking power, because they are justified by their identity. If the conservative is good, then anything the conservative does or says is good while they are doing it or saying it.

    When they can no longer hold power through politics, they always fall back on fascism and bigotry.

  • DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 days ago

    America has always rejected fanaticism

    lol. Let’s see: fought a war to keep slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, Scientology, Kenneth Copeland, the Bakkers, the Mormons, National rifle association, survival preppers — seems to me that the opposite is true.

    • Texas_Hangover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Survival preppers” lol. My year worth of food and water made the pandemic extremely un stressful for me. I did miss toilet paper tho.

  • exanime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Because it’s the only path left they have to attain power. They cannot win on merit, debate, ideas, track record, etc… it’s been like that for a while but now they are getting more and more desperate

  • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I think it’s because they’re cowards. They have been scared into believing that the boogeyman exists, and brainwashed into believing that it’s everyone that disagrees with them.

    And when those doing the brainwashing promises to be the hero that will slay the boogeyman- well, I’d image the cowards will do just about anything to make that happen.

    No one likes a boogeyman. Especially cowards that believe in them.

  • solomon42069@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think it’s the conservative movements final stand to be selfish, retrograde minded and cruel. The majority of people now believe in empathy and doing the right thing but those who don’t have doubled down on their ways.

    My 2c anyway!