• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 months ago

    this has severe conservative energy. the fuck is this even supposed to mean? if you’re paid for it, it’s a job, dumbass. that’s literally the only metric.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        well at least this is a more specific take and, apart from duct tapers, seems roughly sensible in what it’s trying to say, if i understood correctly from my cursory glance, that jobs should be more fulfilling than making the elite feel better.

        but the tweet is doing a very bad job if this is really what they’re alluding to. the tweet’s framing is more similar to reactionary rhetoric against sex work, entertainment and art, clean jobs, and basically anything that’s not coal mining.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          reactionary rhetoric against sex work

          Oh, I can definitely see an animal doing sex work in a… Not-children’s book. I think that’s the whole idea behind furries.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s the “children’s book” bit that’s the important bit though. Basically he’s advocating for a child’s view of the world, where a job requires hitting things with a hammer.

            The irony of course been that the artist who drew that book, presumably wouldn’t be considered to have a worthwhile job by this philosophy.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it’s trying to say that intellectual jobs are not jobs. Which is demonstrably not true.

      If all the investment bankers went away we’d probably be fine but if all the cyber security experts went away there’d be a big problem. The job is labour intensive, but one of them is much less important than the other.

  • boonhet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    I reckon a lot of people would consider my job to not be a real job, but I can imagine a pig sitting in front of a computer just fine.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Quick scan if the comments and not seeing anything about how this pig likely just chopped up either friends or family to turn into bologna for a worm driving an apple.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I get where you’re coming from, and I would love to see a Richard Scary take on “AI Prompt Engineer” or “Influencer”.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      What page was the pig doing the sexual engineering on? Asking for a friend

  • Wilzax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can imagine a pig in a children’s book sitting in front of a computer with several empty coffee cups surrounding it. That covers about 40% of the job market these days.

  • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hard disagree. I can easily imagine anyone in this scenario including some Instagram influencer peddling crypto schemes as this pig.