• Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Oh good they listed them all in one place so if a doctor references it I know to just get up and walk the fuck out.

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 hours ago

    True story, I went to my doctor about losing some weight as I was close to getting diabetes. For some reason, my doctor loudly proclaimed “Here is a prescription for some meds” while handing me the prescription.

    It wasn’t a prescription for meds. My doctor wrote “Due to Big Pharma and the FDA listening in, I have to prescribed various meds. You really should eat healthy diet that has a healthy amount of calories made up of vegetables and fruit. I needed get exercise and should spend time outside to help everything.”

    Big Pharma is everywhere! /s

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Dude needs to take his Sméagol-sounding ass back to Middle Earth and leave science to those who hat the least have a rudimentary knowledge of it.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    12 hours ago

    […] psychedelics […]

    I’m glad that it seems like the war on drugs is showing cracks. I completely support a move to legalize psychedelics.

    • dolle@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yes, but it shouldn’t be legalized for the wrong reasons. We used to justify legalization using arguments about personal freedom for recreational use and pushing for more rigorous research into the therapeutic use cases. Now its popularity in the population is just used to push a pseudo-scientific and anti-science agenda.

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The carrot got dangled in front of the US population for decades and now it’s going to be handed out by the guy holding a knife in his other hand.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    […] ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine […]

    I’ll be honest, I don’t really understand this one. I’d guess that this is likely some hold over grudge from COVID, but I don’t really understand why it’s still a concern to get, presumably, more open access to those drugs. Aren’t we long past that conversation? Feels like beating a dead horse.

  • Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    […] raw milk […]

    I’d support raw milk being legal for consumers to purchase so long as the manufacturers of said raw milk could be held to account for harm caused to a consumer who purchased it under the belief that it was safe — likely, this would also mean that, if it isn’t safe, the product containing raw milk must otherwise display explicit warnings. I think a person should be allowed to take take their own risks.

    • auzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And parents are held responsible if they give it to kids

      Insurance should also not need to cover sickness caused by it

      • Oneser@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Insurance should cover everyone for everything and should remain affordable for all.

          • Ginny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I also think insurance shouldn’t cover cancer treatment for smokers. Or diabetes treatment for overweight people. Or broken bones for skiers. Or literally anything for anyone who has ever done anything bad for them. /s

            • auzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Why shouldn’t they be able to sue cigarette companies or companies releasing unsafe products?

              Why should my insurance be higher whilst cigarette companies are benefiting off their shit marketing

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What is it with this americans aversion for raw milk, it’s not like you’ll fall down dead if you drink it.

            Do you also burn your salmon and cook your meat?

            In france there are lots of cheese (no really?) and many are forbidden for import to the USA because of stuff like raw milk. Guess that’s why we have the watch coming by getting all the dead babies every tuesday.

            Maybe I’m missing something, please do enlighten me!

          • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            What if a child were given raw milk by their parents? Should a child be forced to pay for their parents’ decisions, potentially with their life?

            • auzy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Look up. That’s why I said parents should be held responsible for serving it to kids

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Vaccines are the laziest, lowest effort medicine we have. There is no medical treatment that is more effective for so little actual work on the part of the patient. Which is exactly the kind of medicine we need to have the greatest impact on the population base.

    • julietOscarEcho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Even better than that. You take the medicine and it reduces everyone else’s risk of getting sick, even the ones that refuse to take the medicine. It’s the closest thing we have IRL to literal magic.

      As an immunocompromised person, thank you to everyone who gets vaccinated against communicable disease, you make my world a little less heinous to navigate.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I appreciate your gratitude and I really do hope it does some good for others… Especially because I really hate needles but I have it done anyway for this reason. Lol 😬

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      18 hours ago

      People like RFK don’t get it. Also, has anyone seen a fucking microchip in a syringe… ever?

        • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I love the idea of bio hacking. Too bad the things they do have such poor risk to utility ratio 😂

          When do I get my cyborg legs? That’s what I wanna know

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I think it’s a large variation of a syringe needle that chips our pets, but aside from that monstrously large setup that isn’t even used on humans, no.

        Closest thing I can think of is the capsule sized camera that can be swallowed to collect data as it travels through that long tube that connect mouth to anus. Even then, I’ve never seen that setup used on anyone.

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah, that’s what I mean. You can feel the microchip under the skin with the real ones. But we’re shown a clear liquid going in. Where are the 'chips?

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        You can’t see them without a microscope, duhhh.

        That’s why they’re called MICRO-chips.

  • Wojwo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Stem cells? Does he know what party he’s hitched his wagon to?

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Oh, he knows. They took him on an airplane and made him eat food he had just called “poison” for a photo shoot.

      He couldn’t say no, because of the implication.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Obviously if he did say no, they wouldn’t make him eat it. But the thing is, he’s not gonna say no, because of the implication.