• cm0002@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    3 months ago

    No, the platforms are enshittifiying, but the underlying nuts and bolts of the internet are still there untouched and so far every attempt by big tech to enshittifiy/proprietarize those has thus far failed

  • Lifecoach5000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 months ago

    I feel like smartphones have just made people “internet lazy” - myself included. The masses just want to get an app and let it accomplish whatever you need, without worrying about any kind of enshitification as long as it’s free.

  • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    There’s a phrase that I learned recently that feels relevant to this. “Hermeneutical Injustice”. It means injustice that arises when we are literally unable to meaningfully discuss our experiences with others. For example, “sexual harassment” is a relatively recent phrase, coined in the 1970s, a period when more women were entering the workplace, and employers didn’t have policies for how to respond to workplace sexual harassment. It’s a useful phrase, both legally, and interpersonally, and having access to this phrase that describes something that was previously hard to articulate (“you quit your job because your boss was complimenting you?”) has helped us to reduce hermeneutic injustice by helping us to better understand and respond to the underlying phenomena (for instance, we now understand that people of all genders may experience workplace sexual harassment)

    “Hermeneutic injustice” is why I think the ridiculous prevalence of the word “enshittification” is a good thing. People have latched into that because although it may be a new word, the phenomena it describes have been happening for a while now. I’ve even seen less techy people using it. The anger I’ve been seeing extends beyond people who know about “enshittification”, but its spread and usage is a useful snapshot of how many are feeling. It makes me feel hopeful.

    I’m sleepy right now so I’ll not attempt to discuss more concrete things driving this hope (such as “small web”, Fediverse etc.), but the short of it is that I have a lot of faith in people. Leaning on our communities is how we survive and resist this bullshit, and there will always be people who want to build things for the love of it.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well put, I think at first as well I felt like the term was a bit immature and used a bit too liberally when it first started picking up steam in 2023.

      It really does describe a phenomenon that is becoming so widespread that I’ve softened on it and embraced it (as long as it’s used correctly)

  • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    The internet isnt a person or thing. Its a giant network and its literally whatever the nodes on the network want it to be. Thats why we are here having this discussion on lemmy.

    The internet is so many different things all at once, you can’t really generalize it or say the whole thing is being enshittified.

    I think we all just learned a hard lesson about trusting companies where we are the product rather than the customers. People were very naive in the early days of social media, and advertising.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      You say that like we didn’t see people closing their Reddit communities and moving them to Discord.

      We ain’t learnt shit.

      • Brodysseus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I use discord but i can’t stand it as a platform for discussion. Forums, even reddit, seem so superior to me as a format for discussion and storing information. Maybe I haven’t figured out discord yet

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t think there’s much to figure out.

          It’s IRC, TeamSpeak and a Wiki, wrapped up behind a custom web UI.

          And everyone is going to be so surprised when those investors start demanding their returns, and everybody’s content gets stuffed behind a paywall.

  • knightmare1147@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    This ‘death of the Internet’ talk really irritates me. It’s not. Stop using the big websites and look for or make your own corner in the Internet.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    The internet, no. World Wide Web, unlikely. Commercial domains however have been shit and will continue to enshittify as long as people support their business models.

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    You’re asking that question in one of the places where it will be evolving. The fediverse, or something like it, is the future of the internet.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Never say never. Once the VCs wake up and realize there is no ROI left they will take their billions out of the pool and 90% of companies will struggle to actually create value from a hostile userbase.

    • bobalot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I think 90% of the AI investments really have no commercial viability and are being developed to suck up clueless venture capital.

  • wirehead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    So… I’m not sure if this is an entirely rational thought.

    I’d always wanted to do ham radio but hadn’t bothered. Before my time, ham radio let you do amazing things that weren’t otherwise very easy. Like have a group chat with a bunch of people all over the world. Except when I was looking for things to do, you could get on the Internet and chat with a bunch of people all over the world … without the antennas and hardware and all.

    Lately some stuff happened and my spouse’s friend who lives near Asheville NC and lived through the flooding there where ham radio was the only working form of communications, so my spouse got pressured into buying a radio, which means that I got myself a license because … well, radio works without much infrastructure?

    Mostly I figure I needed to fill the void that was getting on Twitter if something happened locally.

  • FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    See the enshitified hotspots as fly traps for the limp minded. An authentic, simple, commerce free web is still out there, one just needs to look outside of the drivel served up on page one of mainstream search engines

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Well we’re literally in the middle of rolling out http3 so tech will never stop teching.

    If you pine for the old internet spin up a BBS or PHPBB and enjoy some arcane discussions - those things still exist and hosting costs are cheaper than ever so if you pop 200 bucks into an account you can keep it going for decades.

  • Libb@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Like others have suggested already, I have no issue imagining the apparition of new space(s) that will themselves become true alternatives to the Web. Heck, the Web itself become the success it is as an alternative to other online spaces.

    A bit like with TV. I have not owned a TV since the early 00s, because I consider TV mostly crappy content that is also over-saturated with ads, two things I’m not interested in wasting my time with. Luckily, there are alternative ways to access visual content that don’t require me to watch a TV. But TV still exists for people that like it.

    The real question should be: will people be willing to move away from what the web is becoming/has become, the place where all their friends/family/colleagues are, in order to populate a less shitty but newer kind of space? Looking around me, I have some doubts. I remember when blogs were new and cool. The intensity/quality in some of them was great and there were large readership. Today, it’s barely if anyone will click on link that doesn’t point to YT (or reddit, or some other social media)… That doesn’t bode well, imho.

    • Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      My only counterpoint is that people have always moved to the next thing the web has to offer once the old thing has become stagnant/particularly shitty and friends/‘influencers’ (in the more general sense) move too. Remember that one message board? MySpace? Nexopia, if you were a teenage Canadian at the right time (or predator, I guess)? ICQ? MSN? All once very popular, all now relics of a bygone age. And truly old heads will have reference points going even further back.

      There’s hope. Granted, we have far more people online than there were during previous shifts like these, and it at least feels like people are more willing to put up with bullshit from their online spaces than they used to be. But there’s still hope.