The Verge published this spam article about the “best printers of 2024” to demonstrate how terrible Google’s search results are. It now appears as the top non-sponsored post if you search “best printer” on Google.

I love a good, informative troll.

  • frankgrimeszz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    277
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In my recent experience, it recommends shitty blogs loaded with adverts and keywords. Most annoyingly, it always recommends Fandom’s Wiki above better alternative wiki sites. My DuckDuckGo experience has surprisingly been more useful.

    That aside, my Brother laser printer is still working great. No complaints.

    • Pechente@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      My DuckDuckGo experience has surprisingly been more useful.

      Yeah, right!? I remember that one or two years ago DDG was consistently worse than Google but recently Google’s quality has dropped off a cliff. Now when I don’t get the desired result in DDG and switch to Google, the results are usually just as bad or worse.

      • smort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 months ago

        The only time google gets me better results than DDG now is if I have a really vague question, like “movie where the guy wears a trash bag on his leg and has a piña colada on the train to Milwaukee”

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yup. I constantly found myself appending !g for important queries that I needed an answer for right then and now. Google has stopped providing that commodity. It’s almost never worth it anymore to fall back to Google.

    • Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      It has a partnership with bing. So sadly now it is mostly a bing clone. I have been using DDG for a decade. I noticed a distinct drop in search quality after the bing partnership.

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 months ago

      If I’m looking up something general, like some actor or tv show, then DDG is perfect. If im troubleshooting some weird software issue then i find it doesnt always list as many results, as if it hasnt indexed as many sites.

      DDG at least now means I can search random shit without it suddenly being inserted into my social media algorithms like some kind of psychological torture.

    • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh my god the Fandom wiki for minecraft uses the same little tab icon as the actual minecraft wiki but it has a fucking “are you an adult or child” popup EVERY SINGLE TIME a page loads

      I hate it so much

    • rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Use breezewiki extension. Redirects fandom articles to a frontend that removes their bullshit and replaces fandom with independant wikis when possible.

    • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you have any tips or tricks for DDG please do share! I’m definitely getting better overall results there, but the local ones can still be a bit rough.

      • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I found that Qwant gives decent results in my native non English language, results similar in quality to Google, but way better than DDG which often just gives English results.

    • rf_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      What are better alternatives to fandom? I see the incumbents name get repeated more often than the alternative unfortunately.

      • sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        The problem is that fandom tends to vacuum up and supersede the smaller wikis, and the SEO bullshit just makes it happen even faster. The answer to your question unfortunately is “it depends on the game/show/fandom”.

    • UckyBon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      DDG tries very hard to push Amazon and Ebay to me. They’re not even available in my country 😅

        • UckyBon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I don’t know why they would need my location/region. They’re already trying too hard to advertise stuff to me. Isn’t the internet like, international? Other search engines I never get that Ebay/Amazon stuff, it’s a DDG feature for whatever IP I get.

    • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      And by making the search engine worse and worse, they open the opportunity to bring AI chat as a “savior”, and people will think it revolutionized internet search.

  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    2 months ago

    From the article…

    Don’t feel compelled to do it; my only ask is that you make this article go viral by sharing it in faux-outrage that the EIC of The Verge has published an article partially generated by AI, because after the buttons I am going to include a bunch of AI-generated copy from Google’s Gemini in order to pad this thing out.

    I have to admit, it was an interesting read, not quite like anything I’ve ever read before, for a review.

    I honestly can’t tell if this is just some genius way of sliding in some AI generated content into a review and getting it to pass our review, or just an editor-in-chief really frustrated with Google’s search algorithm paying attention to manipulation by others, so trying to really get their stuff out there for us to see.

    Either way, it’s definitely worth the read.

    As far as Brother printers go, I own an all-in-one laser that’s over a decade old, and it’s still going strong. And it actually works with Linux to boot. I do hate though that they do some squirrely stuff to try to get you to buy a new toner cartridge early, but if you mask sensors and such, then an existing toner will work forever.

    Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are very few printers that don’t work with Linux. Linux has drivers to interface with most of them through whatever means you like, right in the kernel.

      That’s one of the reasons my android phone (Linux kernel, remember) is better at finding and queuing up prints on a network printer than any windows machine I’ve ever used.

      I just hit share on a document, choose print… And then it just works.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        There are very few printers that don’t work with Linux.

        I was speaking with the all-in-one types, that includes scanners and fax machines.

        Most printer companies don’t make their drivers work well with Linux (or at the very least used to not), and even Brother was in that same boat early on.

        But as of late they’re much better, so when you run a Brother installer for the drivers it just installs and works now, where in the past you had to worry about 32 bit versus 64 bit libraries in the OS and how they interact with the brother drivers, etc., etc.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I have an MFC-9340 and have also run into this problem. The drivers available in cups allow me to either print two-sided in b&w, or print single-sided in color (at least for the drivers that work at all with the printer). I finally broke down and installed the binary from Brother to get it working fully, but it’s annoying that I can’t just use a generic driver with this printer.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      they do some squirrely stuff to try to get you to buy a new toner cartridge early

      My Brother is newer than yours (the cheapest one I could get that prints on both sides of the paper), and has a setting to toggle how it behaves when toner is low.

      The default is to pause printing until you replace the toner - honestly that’s not entirely wrong. Having the printer run out of toner half way through an important print job could be a disaster.

      The alternative mode is to just show a “low toner” warning badge whenever you print a document. That’s what I use, but I also check if it printed properly before closing the document which a lot of people don’t do. It looks like this:

      As far as I know it’s just a simple counter - how many pages have you printed since it was replaced. Obviously that’s never going to be particularly accurate.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Having the printer run out of toner half way through an important print job could be a disaster.

        What, like the printer would explode or something similar kind of disaster?

        Or the kind of where the printout doesn’t come out well, and you put a new cartridge in, and then you reprint and it looks fine, type of disaster?

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      One of my housemates has a brother printer and I was testing some stuff out on LMDE and noticed it was available to print to. No searching for it or driver to be installed or anything. I don’t actually need to print but that’s pretty cool.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        One of my housemates has a brother printer and I was testing some stuff out on LMDE and noticed it was available to print to. No searching for it or driver to be installed or anything. I don’t actually need to print but that’s pretty cool.

        People keep missing that I’m talking about a all-in-one, and not just a simple printer-only.

        I never had a problem with the printing part of the all-in-one printer, but the scanning and faxing stuff required the Brother driver support, and that wad not natively supported, or were supposed to be supported but it didn’t work well, or at all. There were issues with 32-bit versus 62-bit libraries, etc.

        Took years to get to a point where the brother drivers would just install and everything would work right. And not everything ever worked right from native Linux.

        Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)

        • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The comment I replied to didn’t mention you had any issues. I just wanted to mention something I had noticed that I thought was cool. Not trying to get into a debate about it.

  • umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    2 months ago

    I really need to go through my old files and find The Screenshot from around 1999-2000. Basically, I searched for something in AltaVista and got back a page that was super chock full of ads and “portal crud”. …and a tiny little text that you really had to squint for, somewhere in the middle, that said there were no search results, actually. I got the strong impression that this search engine was fucked.

    Sometimes Google’s results are kind of starting to look like the same, except the crud is in the actual results. Which is something Google could do something about. I mean, they used to care about SEO spam.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      There was an article about that recently. Apparently Marketing won the battle for control over Google Search. So it’s no longer focused on quality of product.

      • NutWrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Google has also gotten lazy. Their first dozen or so searches are either YouTube or Reddit results. (And that’s only when they want to pretend they’re a search engine).

    • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think you’ll enjoy watching the movie called Idiocracy. It is your AltaVista search result extrapolated to full life.

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 months ago

    Google used to list sites with backlinks highly, it was their first ever search algorithm iirc. Once people learned you could game that by planting useless backlinks, Google realised it was a bad idea.

    Somehow, they’ve reinvented this all over again with parasite SEO that fundamentally works the same way. All they did was add some “domain ranking”. Now, unreliable-but-popular sites coughredditcough will always score highly regardless of quality, because Google deemed them superior.

    • psycho_driver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      2 months ago

      reddit is a very good search resource though because it has 15 years of real people giving real information. I imagine reddit from here on out will be going hard on the enshitification train so it’s value as a search resource will rapidly decline.

      • turmacar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 months ago

        Anything post-2022, and probably post-2020, is suspect on Reddit because it became abundantly clear how steerable it was and how easy to generate sales as long as you didn’t do anything too “suspicious”. Current ‘ad guides’ tell advertisers not to link things because just saying the name reads as more authentic.

        Before that it was legitimately people discussing, e.g., the best flashlight for x-y-z purposes. But a decent amount of old stuff has been gutted by people deleting their posts/accounts.

          • TheBlackLounge@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Politics on Reddit has always been shit. Product reviews and recommendations were good. How-to’s and troubleshootings that don’t fit on stackoverflow are still good.

  • Elias Griffin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    Best breadcrumb from article:

    I wanted to understand: what kind of human spends their days exploiting our dumbest impulses for traffic and profit? Who the hell are these [SEO/Google] people making money off of everyone else’s misery?

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t get ads in general. They don’t work. I never bought something that got presented to me from an ad because I know ads are deliberately lying to me, so the product they show is the first product I don’t consider purchasing.

      • AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Time to time i watch twitch from an iPad that I use only for that and an ad banner appeared of a weird but useful adapter for USBC. I clicked on it on purpose (first ad I clicked in a decade probably) the link wasn’t working, dead link. I was speechless.

  • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    With the prevalence of reddit google was of the most useful tools I’ve seen in my 40 years on earth. Only to go to absolute shit in the last 2-3 years.

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Missing the days of Consumer Reports. I think the velocity of new products is too high for them to be relevant for more than a few months once they release a report anymore.

    • CaptSneeze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 months ago

      I still sign up with them when I’m researching bigger, or long-lasting, purchases. Cars, washing machine, and that sort of thing. I’m always a little annoyed at the price, but the content is SO MUCH better than any other online review source that I’m always happy with my decision in the end. Reddit comments are probably second, but I’ve found those to be littered with what seem to me to be suspiciously positive reviews for items that are not significantly better than their competition. I feel like I need to dial up my critical nature to 10 to fight against the echo chamber and/or the covert advertising.

      • nucleative@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I saw a website that was selling Reddit bot services to companies that want to review their products. They would just send a swarm of bad accounts in there and make nice comments. Even replying to their own comments.

        After that I stopped trusting almost every Reddit review (⁠╯⁠°⁠□⁠°⁠)⁠╯⁠︵⁠ ⁠┻⁠━⁠┻

        *Edit: meant to say bot accounts but leaving it

    • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      And Wirecutter used to be good but they will occasionally point out how highly rated something is, and cross checking against falespot et al indicates a lot of fake reviews.

  • AhismaMiasma@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    This was actually a very funny read.

    Also yes, Brother printers are the best because they actually work.

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The next good search engine will unironically be a Microsoft chatbot of some kind

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Sigh. So many things in the world are like this. It’s not a bad idea, in theory, to favor more recent pages in search results. Finding 4 year old information is often not what you want. But in practice, when everyone knows this bias exists, they just fiddle with their pages daily to try to fool the algorithm. It must be aggravating to be Google, because as smart as they are, the entire world is engaged in an unending and ruthless quest to game their results for personal gain.

  • sqw@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    yes i also noticed google search is absolute trash lately. so i switched to searx and life is better. i only go to google for street view and reverse image search now.