• Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Either that or they felt they’d lose the fight where John Deer pulls out of Oregon.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s the first one that came to mind. They started every shitty trend in the industry

          • penquin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Nah, fuck those mother fuckers. As a former farmer myself, I can tell you that fixing my own shit was an almost life or death situation. I can’t just leave my crops without my machines more than a day. Shit needs to work right away. I used to grow rice and it needed constant flow of cold river water for 6 months straight up. I had two diesel water pumps on the river, one is running 24/7 and the other is back up in case the other broke. If that shit broke and I waited for a day or two without giving the rice cold water, it all dies. Completely dies

          • supamanc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yep, according to the article, they have a strong enough lobby bribe machine to win exemption.

        • Leviathan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s the legacy that stinky piece of shit Steve Jobs left behind. That, skirting foreign labor laws, treating your own child like shit and stabbing your friends in the back.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Agreed. But other companies like Samsung and Google that dunked on Apple for their shitty practices, then completely adopt them a few generations later are fucking pathetic.

    • BlindFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      I bought a brother printer model J1010DW because it’s brother, right? Also it was the cheapest brother printer in stock locally around the time I was sick & tired of detouring to the print shop.

      The color cartridges still have tons of ink swashing in them, but the printer won’t even print in b&w because it detects the other cartridges as empty. So I try the tape-over-the-ink-window method, and my printer says, HMM, I GUESS THERE’S INK NOW, BUT THESE MUST NOT BE BROTHER PRINTER CARTRIDGES, HURR DURR, and makes itself an overweight scanner.

      • penquin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have a canon printer that I buy from Walmart (yes, I said buy, not bought). Every time the ink runs out, I’d go buy a whole printer. Printer is $27 and the ink is $35. I don’t really print much, so whatever little print they give with the new printer lasts me for a long time. I’m thinking of just buying a laser one and call it a day since it never dries and it prints up 1500 papers per cartridge.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      We need to eliminate the DMCA. From printer ink to abandon ware to simple ownership of products we purchase, the DMCA stands in the way at every step.

  • aleph@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It’s funny that this article doesn’t mention the one company that pretty much single handedly created the need for this legislation in the first place.

  • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Couldn’t states go after companies under the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act instead of writing new state legislation.

  • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    From the article, parts pairing is “a practice manufacturers use to prevent replacement components from working unless the company’s software approves them.”

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      It’s the practice of preventing you from even using genuine parts. If you buy two identical iPhones, you can’t even use parts from one to repair the other. The one phone won’t accept the genuine part from the other because it’s not paired to that phone by the manufacturer’s proprietary tool.

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        This stops theft significantly.

        iPhone were one of the easiest devices to steal and sell. Even conventional anti theft measures wouldn’t deter theft significantly. Because they are so popular and common stealing an iPhone just to sell parts would still be worthwhile. Making stolen iPhone parts worthless reduces incidence of theft significantly.

        This is less of an issue for other manufacturers. They often have more models serving a small customer base, with significantly less retail value.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I don’t actually know the details of how Pairing or Find My iPhone works, but couldn’t they just have the parts individually report their position since they apparently already “know” which device they belong to?

          • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            They wouldn’t know their location or have a means of sending that location. This would require every subsystem to have a gps antenna, radio and battery. It would be expensive, heavy and wasteful.

            • Syrc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I mean when they’re on a working device. The device detects that the part is not original and uses the usual system to send the position as if it was the entire iPhone. Is that not feasible?

              • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                That’s a good approach for a single device. But for millions it’s not as good. Apples current approach significantly reduces theft and the industry around theft of their phones.

                • Syrc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Why would it not be good? Doesn’t Find my iPhone already work with the whole network?

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      And since the DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent copy protection, they just put copy protection on the software (sometimes laughably weak - still counts!) and if you try to get around the hardware lockout you’re officially breaking the lawwww

    • invertedspear@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hope this applies to cars as well. Bust a taillight in your Ford and get your own replacement, you still have to have a dealer configure the integrated BLISS sensor.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Fuck that sensor. It’s a made up need so I’m more dependent on the manufacturer.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Makes attention a good market for honest business doesn’t it? I’ll move there.

      • BoscoBear@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Oregon has some really great laws. Some are working well, some need adjustment.

        In this case I think manufacturers will just say “not for sale in Oregon” and people in Oregon will continue to buy them. California had an advantage with it’s huge market size.

  • hemmes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have no issue with security devices requiring some sort of approval (which should be made available to self service), but devices like the screen, camera, battery, buttons, memory/storage, ports, speakers, etc, should be allowed whether or not they are factory.

    • WanderingCat@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      In the eyes of apple the screen on an iPhone would act as a security device as it contains the fingerprint sensor.

      • RogueBanana@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Forget the sensors, they can say it’s a security related since it can display private info and their fans would defend that. You can bet they would make some excuse for almost everything and fight for it in court.

      • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Same with the camera, and probably something can be said about the ports too.

        Should apple be allowed to completely close those off though? Nah

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Is this actually good news? What can a single state do? Shouldn’t this be federal?

    • Shir0a@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      3 months ago

      Special exceptions are hard to deal with when you’re mass producing. That’s why a fair amount of the rulings made by the European Union also end up applying to North America when it comes to international businesses.

      It basically means someone like Apple has to decide between not selling in Oregon at all, making special phones for Oregon, or making all of their phones not have paired parts. It’s a pretty big thorn in their side, and it would only take a few more states to join in before they really have to start committing to a solution.

  • pelley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    “We need to cut down the insane cycle of churning through personal electronics”

    Translation: We need to slow down the pace of innovation!

    • Holyginz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      This has to be one of the stupidest takes ive seen. They aren’t innovating, they are making it so things break after set amounts of time, you cant repair it without massive headaches and the expense of proprietary parts, so people end up basically having to buy a new device that is either the exact same or had only a few changes to it but costs more money than the original. That’s not innovation, that’s just a cash grab.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If it means reducing waste… okay?

      I don’t really need much innovation in my personal electronics, I’d still have an iPhone 3GS if it still worked.

    • Luccus@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The innovation of DRM and Intels SGX extention is the reason no current-gen PC can play 4K Blurays in 4K.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Of course they can! You just need to download your blurays from reputable sources.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    3 months ago

    Be careful what you wish for though. Electronics, and software in particular, rapidly drop in reliability as the parts stray from tightly restricted boundaries and become open to anyone. “Hey, this app crashes on my phone now.” Repairing a phone too wouldn’t be cheap either, you’d have to have someone soldering and resoldering a very fine circuit board. I think most people would just replace it.