• lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I think we’re past due for a major technological breakthrough in energy storage that 1) increases energy density, 2) decreases max charge/discharge time, and 3) is more sustainable than, say Lithium.

    With how much R&D seems to be pouring into this right now, I have at least hope.

  • paf0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dirt cheap genetic sequencing and MRNA vaccines will be available to cure various types of cancer.

  • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    It took about 10 years for the internet to go from academic curiosity to mainstream.

    It took about 10 years from the first BlackBerry devices to iPhone/Android ubiquity.

    I think VR and AI are at these points right now.

    • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think road signs will have embedded codes for self driving cars. Whether it’s a local broadcast signal, a QR code, or just extra blocky letters for the computer to read easier, road signage and signals will be directed to the computer in the car, not to inform the human in the car.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe much farther out in the future when autonomous vehicles are the default. That’s a lot of signage to rejigger for very little gain, while mapping and CV already handle that small part of driving quite well.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe, but cars are already pretty good about reading signs.

        It’s the lack of signs that’s the problem. Self-driving cars are pretty good on a well marked and signed road: if that’s all it took, we’re there. It’s the ubiquity of exceptions and edge cases that’s the problem.

        My car recently did a one month trial of self-driving and it was a lot of fun. Also eye-opening. It did work really well on well-marked roads. However it also made me notice just how poorly marked most are. For example, it was great about staying centered between lane lines. However most local roads don’t paint the edge lines, or even the center line is worn off on many roads. Then the car is confused. I can’t even imagine what the car would do if everything were covered with snow, which does happen a lot around here

        • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yea. This is my big thing. Probably good on well traveled and maintained highways. Mostly good on city streets. It’s gonna be dog shit on a rural road.

          I’m also curious how they would handle snow or other inclement weather that obstructs lane lines completely.

      • residentmarchant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        One of the most amazing things about this would be to remove signs altogether. Just embed the sensor in the pavement and give the space the signs took up back to people, nature, or literally anything else.

        Huge overhead highway gantries and traffic lights would be wonderful to remove, too. City sidewalks are narrow enough as is and they would be way better without 20+ft tall metal poles jutting out of the ground. Hopefully we can put trees in their place, but maybe I’m dreaming.

        • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ooo like higher powered rfid tags! The info could even then be relayed to the driver via the on screen display since theyre now all required.

        • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ve thought about this idea for a long time.

          Having sensors in the road (along the side and middle line) and receivers on cars would do a lot of good.

          The sensors could tell the car how close it is to the side/middle. They could tell the car how close other cars are around them. They could tell the car the condition of the road surface (ex wet or icy). They could be programmed to the speed limit of the road and keep the cars moving at that speed. Probably many others uses.

          The downside is building a sensor that can withstand weather, traffic, crumbling infrastructure. Also they would have to have a way to stay powered up for years. And if you made them re-programmable there is another level of security that needs to be added to them. And then there is the cost to retro-fit all the roads with these sensors and building a common receiver that could be installed on new cars.

          I don’t think my idea is practical at all but it’s a cool idea

          • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Surely there is a viable, inexpensive, simple solution. I think it would have to be a permanently programmed chip type of thing that is cheap enough that if you want to change the speed limit or lane specifications, it would be cost effective to replace all the chips along that length of road.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I think optics can make a big difference. Seeing the cameras in cars become much better so that they can read easier. But all road signage is already codified in a way that it should be relatively easy to do OCR or even matching on.

  • Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Server side services. Think of things like office online, Google cloud, etc and just expand on it. We already see some with server side gaming. I think it’ll be more commonplace in our day to day.

    Internet enabled roads, highways. Likely won’t be commonly adopted within 10 years but I could see service providers/car companies rolling it out.

    I think we’re also going to be seeing a lot of robots with new applications. Definitely military. But social and work ones as well.

  • brlemworld@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    Mass produced sodium ion batteries, even cheaper solar panels, scalable water desalination, military adoption of quantum entanglement communication, high speed rail in California, MacBooks with a touchscreen

    • woodgen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      How could that be considerably better than what we have now? It seems to be solved now with stans alone consumer headsets. Or do you anticipate a brain interface in consumer products in the next 10 years?

      • LANIK2000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        There’s plenty of room for improvement. I’m hoping we’ll see more stuff like the bigscreen beyond. The main reason I haven’t used my headset in like a year or 2 is just the annoyance of using it. Setting it up, cleaning it and my self, the weight because no-one wants to make a proper PC headset.

      • Buglefingers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Better tracking body suits, 3D standstill movement tech, better immersive interactions such as adding in EEG reading for movement and actions.

        There’s a lot that could be done in theory, how much goes into that development to make it possible though, we’ll see

            • Nibodhika@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              And that’s the problem, seeing VR on a flat screen and saying it looks fake is like hearing music through busted earphones and saying it sounds awful.

              If you have the opportunity to try some, do, even the first Oculus Quest would do. The graphics don’t matter as much as you think, the refresh rate doesn’t matter as much as you think, the immersion is incredible because you get depth perception which you completely miss from a flat screen.

        • woodgen@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Which current headsets have you tested? By any chance Vision Pro or Quest 3? I consider these the state if the art.

  • golli@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think the satellite based cellular networks like ASTS is currently trying to launch will be ubiquitous.

    The tech already seems good, so it’ll happen much sooner than 34, but I imagine by that point it will just be one of those things everyone takes for granted.


    I can also see small autonomous drones playing a much larger role with various tasks.

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think the “smart” home will become more common.

    I don’t mean that we’ll see smart versions of new things, but more of the basic things, like Light fixtures, smoke alarms, doorbells etc. Consumers will buy less and less of the “dumb” things until EVERYTHING has WiFi built into it.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      No WiFi please. There are much better technologies for home automation.

      Matter/Thread has the potential to make this happen. Finally a common network across both wired and local low powered mesh-based networks that’s easy to use and can do pretty much whatever anyone would need.

      Lots of hype, but very slow rollout means we’re just not seeing that potential develop. You really need to use older tech as well, which keeps it from being available to non-techies