• deranger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    205
    ·
    7 months ago

    The NCTA has repeatedly stated over the years that net neutrality rules aren’t needed because ISPs already follow net neutrality principles. “Internet service providers have always delivered open, unrestricted Internet service. Consumers enjoy the web content and applications of their choosing without any blocking, throttling, or interference,” the group said.

    Lmao, really? The audacity of these cunts.

  • Imprudent3449@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    7 months ago

    The cable lobby loves to bring up rural areas but when we gave them millions to build out they just took the money, said fuck it and did jack shit. I’m beginning to think that they prefer to under serve those areas and then use that as a bargaining chip to get everything they want.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I am in New England. Looking to buy a home. The amount of area that is not covered at 100/10 is fucking criminal. Like, they upped my price this year. For what? Transferring packets didn’t get more expensive. Did you go e your employees raises? No? Are you expanding your infrastructure? No?

      Like what the fuck.

    • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The power companies in my area started installing fiber on the power lines and running their own ISPs.

      No data caps or anything, I’m raw dogging these torrents at like 80 megabytes a second, I even started running my own home server

    • Aecosthedark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 months ago

      In Australia we watched American ISPs do exactly that and then we did the exact same thing with the exact same result because our politicians are corrupt pieces of shit with no backbone, integrity or ethics.

  • daikiki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Eminent domain the final mile and be done with it. These companies have no business holding our national infrastructure hostage.

  • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    7 months ago

    Jessica Rosenworcel is a champ. She has been fighting this fight for years. The week Ajit Pai (Ashit Pie) ended net neutrality using falsified public comments, a group gathered in front of the FCC to protest the change. I went down there for a few hours and Jessica came to the window and waved to us.

        • dream_weasel@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I mean yeah, the sun is in one place, space is basically anywhere else. It’s easier to shoot anywhere than to shoot somewhere.

          • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            hah, no, it really, really isn’t like that at all. shooting straight north or south, for example, is really hard. going in the opposite direction of the earth’s orbit is hard too.

            earth is spinning around the sun. going in the direction the earth is trying to escape the sun from is easy.

            • dream_weasel@iusearchlinux.fyi
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              I have a pretty reasonable grasp of delta V. While my comment is flippant, you can launch Eastward from the equator any day and end up in space: deep space if you have sufficient velocity (though usually you’d do that with one or more gravity assists). The sun is the only other place you can go any day, but there’s huge angular velocity to overcome to make a direct shot.

              It really really is the case mathematically that if you just want to go to deep space it’s not as difficult as trying to figure out how to go to a particular place, as anyone who has ever done trajectory planning with STK will tell you. More difficult from a cost and engineering perspective, sure, but mathematically easier to just shoot in a direction at escape velocity for the sun whatever day you want.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nah, just allow communities to build their local infrastructure. Trust me. You don’t need to threaten the status quo, just allow the market to compete.

      Every town where local fiber is available, Comcast and Spectrum suddenly have cheaper and more reliable service. It’s magical.

      • spikederailed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I lived in Charlotte, NC when Google announced GFiber was coming. Instantly AT&T started running as much fiber as possible and Charter(spectrum) was trying to get people locked into cheaper 3 year contracts. Ultimately AT&T got fiber first so we went with them, and it was vastly better. Charter was getting 60% packet loss every night from oversold infrastructure they didn’t care to fix, as before the announcement the only competition was AT&T uverse in some parts of the city.

      • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean yeah that’s what monopolies do. They eliminate competition by either buying it out or lowering their prices/improving service to drive them out of business so they can then raise prices again. Just cause a small company can come in and make things better while they’re able to be around doesn’t mean we shouldn’t go after these monopolies and cut them down so they can’t have this power.

        • hansl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Municipal broadband is not a small company though. It’s a cooperative owned by residents.

          And in many states it’s actually illegal. Which makes no sense.

          • WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Probably companies like Comcast making sure there isn’t anything to disrupt their monopolies. Another reason to break them up so they can’t have that much power.

  • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    7 months ago

    “heavy-handed regulation will not just hobble network investment and innovation, it will also seriously jeopardize our nation’s collective efforts to build and sustain reliable broadband in rural and unserved communities”

    They said exactly the same thing when the first net neutrality laws were getting put in place, then after the laws went into effect the companies went on to invest record amounts in innovation and infrastructure. Funny how their words are completely meaningless.

      • just_change_it@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Innovation is part of the executive buzzword bingo board for all announcements.

        It doesn’t actually mean anything to these people. The only thing that has weight is what will enrich the wealth of the ownership class (shareholders.)

      • Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You mean like “innovating” faster connections speeds that they’ve been withholding from us for decades, but can suddenly flip a switch and advertise faster speeds when another provider competes with them? Yeah, I wouldn’t know anything about that… ;-)

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Can’t wait until my liberal city finishes our city owned isp. You can’t trust business to be in control of essential services

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    A threat like that should disqualify them from even trying to do it.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    You hear that, law school students? Job security! Because lawyers are the ones who really win in situations like this.

  • Buttons@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Let me plug Counter Points, a favorite political show of mine.

    They recently talked about FTC Chair Lina Khan and Apple’s monopoly, the government’s anti-trust lawsuit against Apple, and monopolies in general. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMyChnACLKQ

    It’s tangential, but it came to mind.

    If the cable companies want lawsuits, let’s give them what they want in the form of anti-trust lawsuits and break them up.

  • ATDA@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    ‘We know we’re the bad guys so we’re going to announce our intentions like a comic book villain…’