• BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Problem solving. Maybe we shouldn’t have pushed STEM so hard to the underpaid, unemployed, underinsured masses.

    -Somebody with the wherewithal probably

  • Tregetour@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    No, Mr Mangione! A Fortune 500 executive is a living, enterprising creature!

    I don’t care…heheheh <ebike swerves onto sidewalk>

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 day ago

    I love how transparent the billionaire media is now. everything I’ve heard about this guy is a character assassination or speculative at best.

    they even mobbed the highschool he graduated from…EIGHT YEARS AGO. All to get some clips they can piece together to fit the narrative that he’s “a bad crazy man with a gun”.

    this shooting has certainly scared the fucking shit out of the aristocracy though. you can tell how scared they are by how hard the media is pushing the story of his capture.

    • TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      Like he’s literally a comp sci nerd who reads books. Literally how can they make him into a bad guy?! everything I learn about him makes me even more down diabolical

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    I admit I’m kinda disappointed. He pulled out almost perfect assassination that looked well thought out, managed to get away with only a few hickups in his plan as far as his face is considered, and then walks around with a murder weapon and a manifesto in his bag? Shame, really. All he needed was to lay low for a while, grow a beard and he’d probably be OK.

    • WamGams@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      You don’t understand.

      The fact that he wrote a manifesto meant he wanted to get caught. The taking the murder weapon and the manifesto to the McDonald’s was his way of saying he had gotten bored waiting for the cops to catch him. He pretty much turned himself in.

    • DrFistington@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      1 day ago

      Don’t be disappointed. I guessed he was going to do this, and for good reason. His options were to either, live a life in fear, worrying that one day he would be caught, or, to basically give him self up, and elect for a Jury trial. Jury nullification is one os the most powerful tools available to the average, non-rich american. If he goes through the trial and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror), then hes a free man, a folk hero, and he sets the precident that killing rich murderers isn’t an automatic crime.

      What he’s doing is the smartest available option, please donate to his legal defense fund.

      • Strawberry@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        and gets acquited (which only takes 1 juror)

        Unfortunately this is not true. 1 juror alone can hang the jury, but they’d have to convince all the other jurors to actually render a verdict of not guilty to avoid a mistrial

        • zephorah@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Have you ever been on a jury? In my experience it’s 2-4 strong personalities and a bunch of people confused by lawyer speak (because two confident authority figures are telling them to believe e two different things and they can’t reconcile the contradiction) and people who just want to go home and thus go along with the strong personalities.

          • Rogue@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Isn’t it always said that jurys are made up of people not smart enough to get out of jury duty.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      I almost want to believe this guy saw how similar he was to the photos and how famous the shooter was getting and decided to take the fall by wandering around in public with some incriminating circumstantial evidence until someone reported him so he could take the credit.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      You’re supposed to grow the beard before and shave it off after. Its much faster to shave it off than grow it back

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      The gun is planted. They just found a crazy guy in order to convince everyone that they actually found the culprit.

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I find that kind of unlikely. If they wanted to frame someone just to have a killer, they wouldn’t be talking about a “3D printed ghost gun”, but just use a regular gun. I, for one, haven’t known that it’s possible to 3D print a pretty well working, and silenced, gun. And that might inspire someone - acquiring weapons is the harder part of any such murder, assuming you don’t want to get caught, and the fact that you can get it without anyone knowing about it makes it way easier.

        • selfAwareCoder@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          People misunderstand 3d printed guns. We use mostly normal gun parts bought anywhere, but legally the pistol handle is considered the gun, and the most popular commercial ones have been plastic for decades. So 3d print that glock frame and put a glock slide on it and you’ve got a cheap glock (and outside of like 3 States, that’s totally legal).

          There’s fairly large 3d printing gun communities, mostly because it’s just fun to build things.

          3d printed silencers are much more rare / fragile because those are illegal to make without ATF approval and silencers need to withstand heat and pressure, so the typical plastic can’t withstand prolonged use.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          They know the guy is a engineer. They came up with the 3D printed gun because it fits with the character, and gives politician an excuse to ban 3D printers all together, “for our safety!”.

          I’m speculating and being a conspiracy theory, but in theory this could make sense. Nobody will ever find out the truth, I’m afraid.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Just yesterday this video of Mike Shake popped in my feed: https://youtu.be/tHzuz09l41U

          Essentially a sniper rifle with compressed air able to propel a 3d-printed bullet at sub-sonic speeds able to break a simulated skull. And it penetrated hard enough to for sure cause major complication for the target. Not to mention that lead slugs can easily be made DIY without much complications and skill. Lead can be melted pretty easily so lol.

          Not much to do besides being able to cut a pipe, make a release mechanism and compile it all with a projectile to shoot. Done is your makeshift weapon.

      • TheFogan@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        To my knowledge, he claimed specifically the money in his bag was planted. Specifically they said there was US and foreign cash in his bag. The fact that Luigi is denying the cash but admitting to the gun and manifesto. To me I think he knew he was going down… but I would be far from supprised if the money was planted either to raise it up to 1st degree murder… or while I’m very far from legally qualified… if they could try and claim he was doing a job for an enemy of the US, could they buypass the trial?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        If they did that and the real killer killed again, what would that achieve? Or is this a one-and-done thing?

        • frostysauce@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          24 hours ago

          If they did that and the real killer killed again, what would that achieve?

          More dead CEOs, I guess. I’m down with that.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            I doubt you will be when the costs of everything go up due to all the corporations hiring massive security teams.

            Something that doesn’t seem to occur to so many of you and something most of you have no response to. In fact, the only response I occasionally get is that it’s worth the cost, which seems to go against the whole reason for the assassination in the first place.

            • frostysauce@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              How much do you think it costs to hire a security detail? I’m pretty sure security for the entire C-suite would be a tiny drop in the bucket for most mega-corporations.

                • Rogue@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  If they could squeeze out an extra dollar then they would already do so. They don’t need to justify it as “increased security costs”.

        • doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Not that I’m fully on board with the theory, but you might be surprised how often “solving” a high profile case is placed above actually getting the right man.

          This is a publicity nightmare for the police, and getting someone in custody “achieves” placating the public and key stakeholders.

          Repeating things about this kids views on the Uni-bomber and referring to his writings as a manifesto “achieves” diminishing his status as a folk hero.

          So while I won’t endorse any particular theory until more evidence comes out, it wouldn’t be the first time putting a scapegoat in jail was deemed more important than letting people think the “perp” got away. Even if the hypothetical real shooter kills again, controlling the narrative can be it’s own goal in cases like this.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 day ago

    Lemmy went from being outraged at the elections to becoming un ironical Unabomber stans so fast that I didn’t even realized it

    • TheFogan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t think it’s fair to liken luigi to the unibomber. Ignoring that his methods were also crazy. The biggest thing to point out on the unibomber is his victims were every day people. Obviously his method was made with collateral damage as a high possibility.

      Luigi, his political leanings seem to be all over the place. But at the end of the day his only victim, was someone who inarguably made choices knowing they would result in the deaths of many people, and bankrupt and ruin the lives of many more.

      • Ostrichgrif@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah I can’t help but feel from everything I read he’s a bit of a STEMcel, but hating health insurance companies is one thing that unites almost all Americans.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          The people shooting Trump would maybe have a 10% approval rating if they succeeded. This healthcare CEO got the whole working class celebrating his deposal. It is truly impressive.

          • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            Trump, for all his flaws, isn’t bankrupting and killing people (at least not directly). Also he’s kind of dumb and I think people see that.

      • frostysauce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Dude, what tells you he “loved” the Unabomber? All I’ve seen is a five-paragraph review of his book of which three paragraphs were a quote.

  • Nanite@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Does the police media briefing affect his right to a fair trial? They mentioned his motivation and mindset and a note. Apparently he implied money had been planted in the charge hearing.

  • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    390
    ·
    2 days ago

    He also had a three-page handwritten manifesto that included grievances with the US healthcare system, a document that spoke to the suspect’s “motivation and mindset”, officials said.

    Publish it then.

  • underwire212@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s a picture of him holding a McD happy meal?? He had the gun and manifesto just laying there in his backpack? You f’ing kidding??

    Some elite fucks used an advanced AI search algorithm to search a bunch of people who vaguely looked like him. Input term search for social media and ‘reviews’ to further narrow down until you find someone who has a few tweets and posts that the media can point to say “yup hey look, he liked Kzynski’s manifesto on goodreads…got the guy!”. Plant evidence, and you got your scapegoat.

    This poor kids’ life is ruined. And he will probably be threatened if he doesn’t plead guilty and waive jury trial. He’ll get a visit from the MIB threatening to skin his family alive in front of him if he doesn’t play along.

    • workerONE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Reading these fantasy takes is exhausting. It’s hard to want to be a part of a community that supports this guy by gaslighting everyone, saying things like “it’s not the same guy in the four photos!” Just hundreds of people all convinced they can secure this guys freedom by acting dumb and face blind- you’ve created a whole fictional scenario here that’s just unbelievable and unrealistic.

      If he didn’t want to get caught he shouldn’t have left DNA all over, shouldn’t have taken off his mask, shouldn’t be carrying the murder weapon days later… He could have helped himself but instead there’s an army of idiots who are probably just creating this fan fiction to impress their peers. It’s very childish though. This guy tried to do something which is commendable, or maybe he’s just mentally ill, but I’m just tired of reading all this nonsense. Who are you signalling to?

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I posted this elsewhere, but this is one of the few times I buy the conspiracy theory, not the official story.

        Dude pulls off a targeted assassination, gets away clean, trolls the cops with a bag of monopoly money, gets out of the state, stays essentially hidden for almost a week… And then gets clocked by some poor maccas employee and gets taken in with a manifesto AND a gun on his person?

        It’s the nazi flag and 3 copies of The Sims all over again, except this time the folks doing it are slightly more competent and actually pulled it off.

        This case is so important, so high profile, that they just need to arrest someone ASAP. Anyone. And that person is not in for a good time.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          2 days ago

          There’s a simple explanation: He wanted to keep on the move, and he wanted to be able to take down other targets.

        • fluxion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          His face jas been plastered everywhere for the past week. My YouTube home page literally had 3-4 thumbnails of his face on every reload. Lemmy…X…news sites…massive exposure.

          So yah…some random worker notices his face looks kind of similar while he’s dining at his favorite spot and bam. Don’t forget there was a $10k bounty, plenty of fast food workers might be itching to collect on something like that.

          He probably figured once he was questioned about anything that they’d eventually get him so he prepared for that scenario. Or maybe this wasn’t even his last stop on his triple-D tour so he was still geared up.

          We’ll see him in court. If he’s innocent then he make a pretty good argument and then we can decide whether to raise eyebrows but this all just seems Q-anon levels of silly right now.

            • Defaced@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              $50k from the FBI?! You gotta be shitting me… If this happened to anyone of us the FBI wouldn’t give a single fuck.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        To be fair, people were posting actors who look like the very shitty pictures we have of the guy too, and I buy some of them. Honestly, the picture we have looks more like Timothée Chalamet than this guy. I’m not saying it isn’t this guy, or it is Chalamet, but there’s a shit ton of people in this world, and a lot look like the shooter.

        Edit to add: I’ll never trust the word of the authorities. They have to prove that this is the man. It’s their duty, not ours.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          If you look at a photo of the guy taken from above him, so a similar angle to the surveillance camera, he looks very similar. I do think it’s him.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            31
            ·
            2 days ago

            They’re going to have to take it to court and provide evidence. Trust is what you give to someone without the need for evidence. If they can prove it, then sure I’ll believe it. I’m not just going to trust that they’re correct without that though.

            • OfficerBribe@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Is there a reason to think there will be no trial and this guy by some reason will end up in some CIA black site without trial?

              I just find it interesting that someone who has absolutely no trust in authorities does not have a theory that court can be influenced by the same authorities.

              • rumba@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                end up in some CIA black site without trial?

                No, he’d end up Epsteined. If the evidence were a plant, he’d be of no use to them alive.

          • Dupree878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 days ago

            Even if they proved it was him it doesn’t matter. When OJ was acquitted, Jurors admitted they did it as a fuck you to the LAPD and justice system.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I understand where you’re coming from. I was in your shoes about 15 years ago, hearing about “crazy conspiracies” or perspectives like mine and dismissing them as baseless and ‘fantasy’.

        My brother/sister, let me be crystal clear—both to you and anyone else who happens to read this: unless you’ve worked in my field, which I can say with near certainty you haven’t, then you haven’t seen, witnessed, or experienced the things I have.

        I say this in all seriousness: these people have unimaginable resources and capabilities. They possess the willpower and determination to execute plans like the ones I’ve described—and far, far worse. I’ve seen far more extreme measures taken for far less than what might be perceived as even a minor threat to the capitalist power structure. They’ve invested immense effort into building and maintaining this system, and I can tell you from personal experience that they’ll go to great lengths to protect it. This is not some wild fantasy or baseless conspiracy theory—it’s entirely within the realm of possibility, and is our reality.

        That said, I completely understand and respect your skepticism. I wouldn’t blame you if you don’t believe me. In fact, I’d expect you not to. Why should you? I’m just an anonymous person behind a pseudonym on a random discussion board, and I have no concrete evidence to present—only my word.

        Take from this what you will.

        • nomous@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          unless you’ve worked in my field, which I can say with near certainty you haven’t, then you haven’t seen, witnessed, or experienced the things I have

          I’ll bite, what field are you in?

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think he knew he was going to get caught. Words on bullets, monopoly money… It’s trying to make the story larger and larger. Pretty sure he will make a show in front of the jury.

      I don’t know if that will work, but I respect that more than he killed the pig without making clear why.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      You can’t convince me this is the real shooter, this guy looks more like Skeet from Jimmy Neutron than the “Grin Reaper” in the now famous pic

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        I said this to many folks IRL, the guy the NYPD charges will not be the shooter. just some poor sap that gets sent to prison for life because he had a dissenting opinion.

        it’s the high price we pay to keep them in power.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      What would “the elites” stand to gain from framing this dude, while the actual killer is still on the loose?

      This is pretty unhinged, to be honest.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          By sending him to prison?

          That’s not really telling people anything they didn’t already know.

      • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        The killer is not as dangerous as the approval for his act. The government wants to prevent copycat vigilantes by making an example out of him. Regardless whether this guy is guilty or not, they’ll drag him through the deepest mud and then string him up with the harshest possible sentence, to discourage others from gunning down CEOs.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I very much doubt the possibility of going to prison will deter someone pissed off enough to kill someone.

      • A Phlaming Phoenix@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not adopting the conspiracy here, but if they can’t find the shooter with the whole country getting behind him, then they would want the optics of finding the shooter. Which could backfire, of course. It would be very telling, for example, if the cops got real confident about it and then the real shooter made some kind of public display with the false shooter in custody.

        • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          This was my thought process, too. If they got a framed guy here, the actual CEO killer would likely or hopefully do something else to let the public know that they were still out there.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah, thats part of the reason I don’t buy it. If the actual killer acts again, it will be very embarrassing for the police.

      • underwire212@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I get that. However, the optics of having a successful “martyr” symbol is very, very dangerous. A wide scope of narrative means difficult to control. Difficult to control introduces “motivator to action” symbols among a, I think, specific (and quite populous) demographic (think of all the young males with zero purpose, waiting to seize on an opportunity for a real life Mr Robot, for example)… “well if he could do it, get away with it, AND become a ’hero’, what’s stopping me from doing the same?”

        Having someone, anyone, buys time to craft the narrative and gauge public sentiment and, most importantly, dampen the probability of a revolutionary ’spark’ if you will.

        Obviously we don’t have enough information here. It very well could be the dude they have in custody. I am only sharing one possible theory based off my experience and observations. And there are a number of very suspect observations here that are in line with narrative management.

        • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think the actual truth is, this guy isn’t a criminal mastermind, and he got caught.

          He also looks a lot like the surveillance photo.

        • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          He was an ivy league grad, vacations in Bali, and his family owns a country club and a chain of nursing homes. He almost certainly has more money than the guy he shot.

            • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              He was CEO, not founder. The dude was only worth around $50 million. The shooters family owns a country club and an entire chain of nursing homes. They almost certainly have more money, probably a lot more money.

              I can’t answer your other questions. Perhaps the answers will be in his manifesto.

          • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No way that he personally had more money than the CEO, from just looking at his work history. Maybe his whole family has more money than the CEO, but if we compared whole families against each other, the CEOs family would still come out on top.